Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905311›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

The transcriptional response to yellow and wilt disease, caused by race 6 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Ciceris in two contrasting chickpea cultivars.

Aliakbar Faramarzpour, Sara Dezhsetan, Hamid Hassaneian Khoshro, Raheleh Mirdar Mansuri, Hamid Reza Pouralibaba, Zahra-Sadat Shobbar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aliakbar FaramarzpourDepartment of Plant Production & Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
Sara DezhsetanDepartment of Plant Production & Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran. sdezhsetan@uma.ac.ir.
Hamid Hassaneian KhoshroDryland Agricultural Research Institute (DARI), Agriculture Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Maragheh, Iran.
Raheleh Mirdar MansuriDepartment of Systems Biology, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
Hamid Reza PouralibabaDryland Agricultural Research Institute (DARI), Agriculture Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Maragheh, Iran.
Zahra-Sadat ShobbarDepartment of Systems Biology, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran. shobbar@abrii.ac.ir.

Funding

Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII) 013-15-1505-114-97027-971295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) ranks as the third most crucial grain legume worldwide. Fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri (Foc)) is a devastating fungal disease that prevents the maximum potential for chickpea production.

resultsTo identify genes and pathways involved in resistance to race 6 of Foc, this study utilized transcriptome sequencing of two chickpea cultivars: resistant (Ana) and susceptible (Hashem) to Foc race 6. Illumina sequencing of the root samples yielded 133.5 million raw reads, with about 90% of the clean reads mapped to the chickpea reference genome. The analysis revealed that 548 genes (332 upregulated and 216 downregulated) in the resistant genotype (Ana) and 1115 genes (595 upregulated and 520 downregulated) in the susceptible genotype (Hashem) were differentially expressed under Fusarium wilt (FW) disease stress caused by Foc race 6. The expression patterns of some differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were validated using quantitative real-time PCR. A total of 131 genes were exclusively upregulated under FW stress in the resistant cultivar, including several genes involved in sensing (e.g., CaNLR-RPM1, CaLYK5-RLK, CaPR5-RLK, CaLRR-RLK, and CaRLP-EIX2), signaling (e.g., CaPP7, CaEPS1, CaSTY13, and CaPR-1), transcription regulation (e.g., CaMYBs, CaGLK, CaERFs, CaZAT11-like, and CaNAC6) and cell wall integrity (e.g., CaPGI2-like, CaEXLs, CaCSLD and CaCYP73A100-like).

conclusionsThe achieved results could provide insights into the molecular mechanism underlying resistance to FW and could be valuable for breeding programs aimed at developing FW-resistant chickpea varieties.

Indexed as

CicerFusariumPlant DiseasesDisease ResistanceGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantTranscriptomeBiotic stressChickpeaFusarium wilt (race 6)RNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39905311
PMCPMC11792444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.