ArticleBMC genomics2025
Using RAD-seq to identify and differentiate the medicinal herb Scrophularia ningpoensis and its adulterants.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial genome of the invasive weed Amaranthus palmeri: structural features, RNA editing, and evolutionary insights.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundScrophulariae Radix, the dried root of Scrophularia ningpoensis Hemsl., belongs to the Scrophulariaceae family and is known for its diverse pharmacological effects, such as antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, and antitumor properties. It is common that the Scrophulariae Radix is often contaminated by various adulterants like S. buergeriana, S. kakudensis, and S. yoshimurae in its medicinal usage. However, traditional methods for identifying Chinese medicinal materials have been found to be insufficient in accurately distinguishing S. ningpoensis from the three adulterant species.
resultsIn this study, RAD-seq technology was employed to sequence 27 individuals from the four species, yielding 55,250 high-quality SNP sites. Genetic differentiation analysis using these sites revealed significant genetic divergence between S. ningpoensis and the three adulterants. Through assessment genetic structure, principal component, and phylogenetic analysis, these four species were effectively distinguished with a high degree of confidence. The phylogenetic results indicated that S. ningpoensis is more closely related to S. yoshimurae, while S. buergeriana shows a closer relationship with S. kakudensis, providing new reference information for understanding interspecific relationships among the four Scrophularia species.
conclusionsThis study successfully identified S. ningpoensis and the three adulterants, enriched the genomic information of Scrophularia species, and contributed to a more profound understanding of the evolutionary dynamics within this genus. Furthermore, it offers novel insights and methodologies for the identification of medicinal plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.