Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905289›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

Using RAD-seq to identify and differentiate the medicinal herb Scrophularia ningpoensis and its adulterants.

Lei Guo, Xia Wang, Hong Li, Mengli Zhou, Liqin Liu, Ruihong Wang, Pan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lei GuoZhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Plant Secondary Metabolism and Regulation, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.
Xia WangZhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Plant Secondary Metabolism and Regulation, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.
Hong LiZhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Plant Secondary Metabolism and Regulation, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.
Mengli ZhouZhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Plant Secondary Metabolism and Regulation, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.
Liqin LiuTCM Dispensary, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, 310020, China.
Ruihong WangZhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Plant Secondary Metabolism and Regulation, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 310018, China. ruihong8977@zstu.edu.cn.
Pan LiLaboratory of Systematic & Evolutionary Botany and Bioaffiliationersity, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China. panli@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

General Scientific Research Projects of the Department of Education of Zhejiang Province No.Y202353132Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province grant no. 2023C02017Key Technology Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province No. 2023C03138The Fundamental Research Funds of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University 24042128-YThe Major Science and Technology Projects of Breeding New Varieties of Agriculture in Zhejiang Province No. 2021C02074Zhejiang Province Basic Public Welfare Research Program Project LGN22H280005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScrophulariae Radix, the dried root of Scrophularia ningpoensis Hemsl., belongs to the Scrophulariaceae family and is known for its diverse pharmacological effects, such as antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, and antitumor properties. It is common that the Scrophulariae Radix is often contaminated by various adulterants like S. buergeriana, S. kakudensis, and S. yoshimurae in its medicinal usage. However, traditional methods for identifying Chinese medicinal materials have been found to be insufficient in accurately distinguishing S. ningpoensis from the three adulterant species.

resultsIn this study, RAD-seq technology was employed to sequence 27 individuals from the four species, yielding 55,250 high-quality SNP sites. Genetic differentiation analysis using these sites revealed significant genetic divergence between S. ningpoensis and the three adulterants. Through assessment genetic structure, principal component, and phylogenetic analysis, these four species were effectively distinguished with a high degree of confidence. The phylogenetic results indicated that S. ningpoensis is more closely related to S. yoshimurae, while S. buergeriana shows a closer relationship with S. kakudensis, providing new reference information for understanding interspecific relationships among the four Scrophularia species.

conclusionsThis study successfully identified S. ningpoensis and the three adulterants, enriched the genomic information of Scrophularia species, and contributed to a more profound understanding of the evolutionary dynamics within this genus. Furthermore, it offers novel insights and methodologies for the identification of medicinal plants.

Indexed as

Plants, MedicinalScrophulariaDrug ContaminationPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNAPhylogenomicsRAD-seqScrophulariaSNPSpecies identification

Identifiers

PMID39905289
PMCPMC11796183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.