Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905275›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

Comprehensive Analysis of Event-Related Potentials of Response Inhibition: The Role of Negative Urgency and Compulsivity.

Verena Wüllhorst, Raoul Wüllhorst, Rebecca Overmeyer, Tanja Endrass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Verena WüllhorstFaculty of Psychology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universtität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6976-2351
Raoul WüllhorstFaculty of Psychology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universtität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1394-6415
Rebecca OvermeyerFaculty of Psychology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universtität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7336-7984
Tanja EndrassFaculty of Psychology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universtität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8845-8803

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC 940/2-3Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EN 906/6-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EN 908/8-1TU Dresden
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral and neural correlates of response inhibition are assumed to relate to impulsivity and compulsivity, but findings are inconsistent, possibly due to prior research studying these dimensions in isolation. Negative urgency, the tendency to act impulsive under negative affect, and compulsivity relate to various mental disorders and are assumed to reflect deficits in inhibitory control. However, few studies have examined how response inhibition relates to negative urgency, compulsivity, or their interaction. To address this gap, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the behavioral and neural correlates of response inhibition and their associations with negative urgency and compulsivity. We examined 233 participants who performed a stop-signal task while electroencephalography was recorded. The analysis involved single-trial regression and latency analyses to explore the relationships with self-reported negative urgency and compulsivity. Stop-signal reaction times (SSRTs) and negative urgency were associated with an attenuated P3 effect contrasting successful stop versus go trials. Crucially, longer SSRT was associated with reduced P1 amplitudes (on successful and failed stops) and a later onset and peak of the P3. Interestingly, the opposite pattern was observed for higher negative urgency with higher P1 amplitudes and an earlier P3 onset and peak in successful stop trials. Associations with compulsivity were not observed. Considering early sensorimotor processes and latency effects are important to capture differences between negative urgency and SSRT. Higher stop-signal-related P1 amplitudes and a faster action cancellation process may compensate reduced P3-related activity in high negative urgency.

Indexed as

BrainCompulsive BehaviorEvoked PotentialsImpulsive BehaviorInhibition, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung AdultcompulsivityEEGimpulsivitynegative urgencyresponse inhibitionsingle‐trial‐regression analyses

Identifiers

PMID39905275
PMCPMC11794679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.