ArticleScientific reports2025
Using deep learning model integration to build a smart railway traffic safety monitoring system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acoustic sentinel: hierarchical classification of footstep sound using fine and coarse-grain acoustic feature representations for tactical surveillance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Real-Time Railway Hazard Detection Using Distributed Acoustic Sensing and Hybrid Ensemble Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the importance of railway safety, it is crucial to build a smart railway traffic safety system in Taiwan, especially there are often to see related accidents. Therefore, this study aimed to build a smart railway traffic safety system using the integration of object detection, segmentation, machine learning, and notification system. First, the Mask R-CNN model was applied to automatically build the digital boundaries of railway, which achieved an average Interest of Union (IOU) of over 0.9. Then, the YOLO v3 model was applied to detect intrusions of railway, especially humans' intrusion. The above object detection model achieved an Overall accuracy (OA) of over 90% for different classes, and an OA of 95.68% for human detection. The YOLO v3 model was also able to detect intrusion within different scenarios, such as nighttime, rainy daytime, and rainy nighttime. Moreover, the XGBoost model was applied to predict the sizes of intruding objects, which has a low MAE of 0.54 cm and an R2 score of 0.997. Finally, the LINE bot was applied to notify the related operators, including the above information, such as time of intrusion, locations, classes of intruding objects, sizes and the image of intrusion. The above implementation can be helpful for railway traffic safety monitoring, which may help related accidents prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.