ArticleScientific reports2025
PCR-based detection of Botryosphaeria canker pathogens in fig trees.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seasonal Effects on Pathogenicity and Biocontrol Management ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrated multi-omics identifies plant hormone signal transduction and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis as key pathways in kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa) resistance to Botryosphaeria Dothidea infection.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Canker and dieback, caused by members of the Botryosphaeriaceae family, pose significant threats to plant productivity, food security, and natural ecosystems, particularly in economically important woody crops including fig trees. Detecting and identifying these pathogens is challenging due to their latent infections and the presence of multiple pathogens within the same host. In our study, we developed a PCR assay using three carefully selected primer pairs based on sequence differences in two protein-coding genes, β-tubulin and RNA polymerase II. The species-specific primers TUB-Bd1 (specific for Botryosphaeria dothidea), TUB-Np1 (specific for Neofusicoccum parvum), and RPB-Nd2 (specific for Neoscytalidium dimidiatum) effectively amplified target gene sequences in pure cultures and infected tissue samples using PCR and nested PCR conditions. The efficiency test results demonstrated that TUB-Bd1, TUB-Np1, and RPB-Nd2 primer pairs could detect specific DNA fragments at very low concentrations in nested PCR. Furthermore, we collected 180 symptomatic and asymptomatic fig samples from different regions of Fars Province, Iran. Applying the species-specific primer pair RPB-Nd2 in direct PCR led to the detection of N. dimidiatum in 25.5% of symptomatic woody samples and 13% of asymptomatic one-year-old branch samples of fig trees. This represents a significant improvement compared to the mere 6.67% detected using traditional culturing methods on PDA. Interestingly, neither B. dothidea nor N. parvum were detected in the 180 samples using nested PCR. Moreover, multiplex PCR enabled simultaneous DNA detection of the target Botryosphaeriaceae pathogens. Our findings emphasize the importance of molecular techniques for early detection of evident and latent infections caused by these three pathogens in fig trees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.