ArticleScientific reports2025
Simultaneous prediction of 10m and 100m wind speeds using a model inspired by brain emotional learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The use of the smart eye camera for diagnosing and grading cataract in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in an outpatient setting in Jordan.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Enhanced significant wave height prediction in the Southern Ocean using an ANFIS model optimized with subtractive clustering.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analyzing the cyclical impact of sunspot activity and ENSO on precipitation patterns in Gilan province: a wavelet-based approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting wind speed simultaneously at multiple heights, particularly at 10 and 100 metres (m), presents unique challenges due to diverse influences. At lower altitudes, wind speed is significantly affected by surface factors including roughness, vegetation, and man-made structures, causing sharp fluctuations, while at higher altitudes, it is primarily influenced by atmospheric conditions, resulting in smoother flow patterns. Traditional models often require separate systems for each altitude, limiting their efficiency and accuracy. This study introduces the brain emotional learning based on basic and functional memories (BELBFM) model, inspired by adaptive emotional learning mechanisms in the mammalian brain, to predict wind speeds at both altitudes simultaneously. Using ERA5 reanalysis data, BELBFM effectively captures the nonlinear dynamics of wind behavior. Evaluation with data from the Persian Gulf demonstrates BELBFM's high accuracy, enhancing predictive capabilities for applications in renewable energy and structural engineering. This unified model provides a robust and efficient solution for adaptive wind forecasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.