Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905114›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Museomics and morphological analyses of historical and contemporary peninsular Italian wolf (Canis lupus italicus) samples.

Elena Fabbri, Antonia Vecchiotti, Federica Mattucci, Edoardo Velli, Vilde Arntzen Engdal, Nicola Baccetti, Adriano De Faveri, Pavel Hulva, Barbora Černá Bolfíková, Urmas Saarma and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elena FabbriUnit for Conservation Genetics (BIO-CGE), Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Via Cà Fornacetta 9, Bologna, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy. elena.fabbri@isprambiente.it.
Antonia VecchiottiBiodiversity Management and Monitoring Office, Majella National Park, via Badia 28, Sulmona, 67039, L'Aquila, Italy.
Federica MattucciUnit for Conservation Genetics (BIO-CGE), Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Via Cà Fornacetta 9, Bologna, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
Edoardo VelliUnit for Conservation Genetics (BIO-CGE), Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Via Cà Fornacetta 9, Bologna, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
Vilde Arntzen EngdalDepartment of Preclinical Sciences and Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.
Nicola BaccettiZoological Museum, Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Via Cà Fornacetta 9, Bologna, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
Adriano De FaveriZoological Museum, Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Via Cà Fornacetta 9, Bologna, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
Pavel HulvaDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague 2, 128 43, Czech Republic.
Barbora Černá BolfíkováFaculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Prague, 16500, Czech Republic.
Urmas SaarmaDepartment of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, J. Liivi 2, Tartu, 50409, Estonia.
Elisabetta CilliDepartment of Cultural Heritage, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, via degli Ariani 1, Ravenna, 48121, Italy.
Romolo CanigliaUnit for Conservation Genetics (BIO-CGE), Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Via Cà Fornacetta 9, Bologna, 40064, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy. romolo.caniglia@isprambiente.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After centuries of decline and protracted bottlenecks, the peninsular Italian wolf population has naturally recovered. However, an exhaustive comprehension of the effects of such a conservation success is still limited by the reduced availability of historical data. Therefore, in this study, we morphologically and genetically analyzed historical and contemporary wolf samples, also exploiting the optimization of an innovative bone DNA extraction method, to describe the morphological variability of the subspecies and its genetic diversity during the last 30 years. We obtained high amplification and genotyping success rates for tissue, blood and also petrous bone DNA samples. Multivariate, clustering and variability analyses confirmed that the Apennine wolf population is genetically and morphologically well-distinguishable from both European wolves and dogs, with no natural immigration from other populations, while its genetic variability has remained low across the last three decades, without significant changes between historical and contemporary specimens. This study highlights the scientific value of well-maintained museum collections, demonstrates that petrous bones represent reliable DNA sources, and emphasizes the need to genetically long-term monitor the dynamics of peculiar wolf populations to ensure appropriate conservation management actions.

Indexed as

WolvesAnimalsDNAGenetic VariationGenotypeItalyMuseumsPetrous BoneDNAApennine Italian wolvesCanis lupus italicusConservation managementGenetic variability patternsHistorical biological samplesMultilocus genetic profilesMuseomicsMuseum collectionsPopulation genetics

Identifiers

PMID39905114
PMCPMC11794570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.