Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905096›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Prediction of the axial compression capacity of ECC-CES columns using adaptive sampling and machine learning techniques.

Khaled Megahed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Khaled MegahedDepartment of Structural Engineering, Mansoura University, PO Box 35516, Mansoura, Egypt. k.megahed@mans.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3526-1142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An innovative form of concrete-encased steel (CES) composite columns incorporating engineered cementitious composites (ECC) confinement (ECC-CES) has recently been introduced, displaying superior performance in failure behavior, ductility, and toughness compared to traditional CES columns. This study presents an innovative approach to predicting the axial capacity of ECC-CES columns using adaptive sampling and machine learning (ML) techniques. This study initially introduces a finite element (FE) modeling for ECC-CES columns, integrating material and geometric nonlinearities to accurately capture the inelastic behavior of ECC and steel through appropriate constitutive material laws. The FE model was validated against experimental data and demonstrated strong predictive accuracy. An adaptive sampling process is employed for efficient exploration of the design space to generate a database of 840 FE models. Subsequently, seven ML models are utilized to predict the axial compression capacity based on the FE database. These models were comprehensively evaluated, displaying a superior prediction performance compared to design standards such as EC4 and AISC360. From evolution metrics, the Gaussian process regression, CatBoost (CATB), and LightGBM (LGBM) models emerged as the most accurate and reliable model, with nearly more than 97% of FE samples within the 10% error range. Despite the robust performance of the ML models, their black-box nature limits practical applicability in design contexts. To address this, the study proposes a symbolic regression-derived design that offers interpretable, explicit design equations with competitive performance metrics.

Indexed as

Adaptive samplingCatBoost modelEngineered cementitious compositesFinite element modellingMachine learningSymbolic regression

Identifiers

PMID39905096
PMCPMC11794466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.