Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905091›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Carboxypeptidase B1 in dialyzed chronic kidney disease patients.

Matej Stančík, Marián Grendár, Marián Mokáň

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matej StančíkDepartment of Internal Medicine I., Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic. matej_stancik@hotmail.com.
Marián GrendárLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Biomedical Centre Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Marián MokáňDepartment of Internal Medicine I., Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.

Funding

Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja VV-14-0153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carboxypeptidase B1 has long been known to be a pancreas-specific tissue enzyme. In this paper we focus on Carboxypeptidase B1 concentration measurement in dialyzed chronic kidney kidney disease patients and on the effect dialysis adequacy and regimen exert on its concentration. A total of 142 subjects were divided into control and target groups. In the target group two measurements of plasma Carboxypeptidase B1 one month apart were conducted with the use of Carboxypeptidase B1 ELISA kit. The mean Carboxypeptidase B1 concentration was significantly higher in the target arm compared to the control arm (77.60 ± 11.81 ng/mL and 1.22 ± 0.41 ng/mL, respectively; p < 0.001). Generalized linear mixed regression revealed that affiliation with the control arm was the only significant contributor of this finding. Linear mixed model regression revealed that dialysis regimen that represents number of dialyses per one week-long cycle is a significant predictor of Carboxypeptidase B1 concentration. Exploration of the estimated marginal means of Carboxypeptidase B1 revealed that the Carboxypeptidase B1 concentration was significantly higher among patients on twice per week dialysis regimen than among those treated with three dialysis sessions per week.

Indexed as

Carboxypeptidase BRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdultAgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersCarboxypeptidase BCarboxypeptidase B1Chronic kidney diseaseDialysisUremic soluteUremic toxin

Identifiers

PMID39905091
PMCPMC11794884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.