Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905084›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparison evaluation of bacterial DNA extraction methods for improved molecular diagnostic accuracy of sepsis-causing pathogens in clinical whole blood samples.

Byungjoon Na, Junghun Park, Sojin Park, Eunseon Park, Jimin Jang, Yu-Hee Kim, Jinyeop Lee, Hae-Sun Chung

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Byungjoon Na *KingoBio, Inc. Research Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Junghun Park *Ewha Education & Research Center for Infection, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Sojin ParkKingoBio, Inc. Research Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Eunseon ParkKingoBio, Inc. Research Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Jimin JangKingoBio, Inc. Research Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Yu-Hee KimEwha Education & Research Center for Infection, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Jinyeop LeeKingoBio, Inc. Research Center, Seoul, South Korea. jyleeceo@kingobio.co.kr.
Hae-Sun ChungEwha Education & Research Center for Infection, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. sunny0521.chung@ewha.ac.kr.

Funding

Ministry of SMEs and Startups S3198545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis, a leading cause of mortality, requires rapid and accurate pathogen identification to ensure effective treatment. Current diagnostic methods such as blood cultures are time-consuming, whereas molecular diagnostic techniques represent a promising alternative for faster pathogen detection. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate different DNA extraction methods for the improved detection of infectious pathogens in the bloodstream. Specifically, we compared one column-based DNA extraction method (QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit) with two magnetic bead-based DNA extraction methods (K-SL DNA Extraction Kit and GraBon™ system). Real-time PCR was performed using specific primers to assess the efficiency of each method. The K-SL DNA Extraction Kit and GraBon™ system exhibited higher accuracy rates of 77.5% (22/40) and 76.5% (21/40), respectively, compared to the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit, which had an accuracy rate 65.0% (12/40) for Escherichia coli detection, whereas the GraBon™ system demonstrated higher accuracy rate of 77.5% (22/40) than the other two methods, which had an accuracy rates of 67.5% (14/40) for Staphylococcus aureus detection. All methods displayed high specificity for negative samples (100%). These findings highlight the superior performance of magnetic bead-based methods, particularly when automated, for extracting bacterial DNA from whole blood samples. Such methods may enable the more rapid and accurate diagnosis of bloodstream infections, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesSepsisEscherichia coliHumansReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityStaphylococcus aureusDNA, BacterialDNA extractionMagnetic beadMolecular diagnostic techniqueSepsisWhole blood

Identifiers

PMID39905084
PMCPMC11794844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.