ArticleScientific reports2025
Automatic cervical lymph nodes detection and segmentation in heterogeneous computed tomography images using deep transfer learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Picture Archiving and Communication System-Integrated Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based computed tomography detection of early lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- MSA U-Net: a multi-scale attention-enhanced network for automatic segmentation of uterine lymph nodes in MRI images.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- CT Radiomics Models Did Not Outperform Experts in Predicting [Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Automated Lymph Node Localization and Segmentation in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Opportunities and Limitations of Using a Generic AI Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep learning for malignant lymph node segmentation and detection: a review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To develop a deep learning model using transfer learning for automatic detection and segmentation of neck lymph nodes (LNs) in computed tomography (CT) images, the study included 11,013 annotated LNs with a short-axis diameter ≥ 3 mm from 626 head and neck cancer patients across four hospitals. The nnUNet model was used as a baseline, pre-trained on a large-scale head and neck dataset, and then fine-tuned with 4,729 LNs from hospital A for detection and segmentation. Validation was conducted on an internal testing cohort (ITC A) and three external testing cohorts (ETCs B, C, and D), with 1684 and 4600 LNs, respectively. Detection was evaluated via sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and false positive rate per case (FP/vol), while segmentation was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD95). For detection, the sensitivity, PPV, and FP/vol in ITC A were 54.6%, 69.0%, and 3.4, respectively. In ETCs, the sensitivity ranged from 45.7% at 3.9 FP/vol to 63.5% at 5.8 FP/vol. Segmentation achieved a mean DSC of 0.72 in ITC A and 0.72 to 0.74 in ETCs, as well as a mean HD95 of 3.78 mm in ITC A and 2.73 mm to 2.85 mm in ETCs. No significant sensitivity difference was found between contrast-enhanced and unenhanced CT images (p = 0.502) or repeated CT images (p = 0.815) during adaptive radiotherapy. The model's segmentation accuracy was comparable to that of experienced oncologists. The model shows promise in automatically detecting and segmenting neck LNs in CT images, potentially reducing oncologists' segmentation workload.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.