Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905029›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Automatic cervical lymph nodes detection and segmentation in heterogeneous computed tomography images using deep transfer learning.

Wenjun Liao, Xiangde Luo, Lu Li, Jinfeng Xu, Yuan He, Hui Huang, Shichuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenjun LiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital Affiliate to School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Xiangde LuoSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China.
Lu LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital Affiliate to School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jinfeng XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Yuan HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 23000, Anhui, China.
Hui HuangCancer Center, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610072, China.
Shichuan ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital Affiliate to School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China. zhangsc65@hotmail.com.

Funding

National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China 82203197the Sichuan Provincial Cadre Health Research Project 2023-803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop a deep learning model using transfer learning for automatic detection and segmentation of neck lymph nodes (LNs) in computed tomography (CT) images, the study included 11,013 annotated LNs with a short-axis diameter ≥ 3 mm from 626 head and neck cancer patients across four hospitals. The nnUNet model was used as a baseline, pre-trained on a large-scale head and neck dataset, and then fine-tuned with 4,729 LNs from hospital A for detection and segmentation. Validation was conducted on an internal testing cohort (ITC A) and three external testing cohorts (ETCs B, C, and D), with 1684 and 4600 LNs, respectively. Detection was evaluated via sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and false positive rate per case (FP/vol), while segmentation was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD95). For detection, the sensitivity, PPV, and FP/vol in ITC A were 54.6%, 69.0%, and 3.4, respectively. In ETCs, the sensitivity ranged from 45.7% at 3.9 FP/vol to 63.5% at 5.8 FP/vol. Segmentation achieved a mean DSC of 0.72 in ITC A and 0.72 to 0.74 in ETCs, as well as a mean HD95 of 3.78 mm in ITC A and 2.73 mm to 2.85 mm in ETCs. No significant sensitivity difference was found between contrast-enhanced and unenhanced CT images (p = 0.502) or repeated CT images (p = 0.815) during adaptive radiotherapy. The model's segmentation accuracy was comparable to that of experienced oncologists. The model shows promise in automatically detecting and segmenting neck LNs in CT images, potentially reducing oncologists' segmentation workload.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHead and Neck NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLymph NodesTomography, X-Ray ComputedFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeckSensitivity and SpecificityDeep learningDetectionHead and neck cancerNeck lymph nodeSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID39905029
PMCPMC11794882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.