ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of cold region dew volume based on an ECOA-BiTCN-BiLSTM hybrid model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a hybrid prediction model, ECOA-BiTCN-BiLSTM, for predicting dew in cold areas. The model integrates BiTCN and BiLSTM neural networks to enhance performance. An enhanced Crayfish optimization algorithm (ECOA) with four mixed strategies was employed to optimize the model's hyperparameters and reduce the impact of arbitrary selection. The proposed ECOA-BiTCN-BiLSTM model was validated using dew data from farmland in a northeastern Chinese city. Comparative experiments were conducted against the BiTCN model, the BiLSTM model, the original BiTCN-BiLSTM model, and other models optimized with advanced swarm intelligence algorithms. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.002424, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.003984, and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.123050, with a coefficient of determination R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.