Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39905003›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

Identifying neurobiological heterogeneity in clinical high-risk psychosis: a data-driven biotyping approach using resting-state functional connectivity.

Xiaochen Tang, Yanyan Wei, Jiaoyan Pang, Lihua Xu, Huiru Cui, Xu Liu, Yegang Hu, Mingliang Ju, Yingying Tang, Bin Long and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xiaochen Tang *Neuromodulation Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3796-7111
Yanyan Wei *Neuromodulation Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiaoyan PangSchool of Government, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China.
Lihua XuNeuromodulation Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2237-9336
Huiru CuiNeuromodulation Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xu LiuNeuromodulation Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yegang HuNeuromodulation Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Mingliang JuNeuromodulation Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yingying TangNeuromodulation Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Bin LongNeuromodulation Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wei LiuSchool of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Min SuNingde Rehabilitation Hospital, Ningde, China. 1465972669@qq.com.
Tianhong ZhangNeuromodulation Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. zhang_tianhong@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5379-7119
Jijun WangNeuromodulation Center, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. jijunwang27@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5427-7425

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82171544Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission) 202240268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore the neurobiological heterogeneity within the Clinical High-Risk (CHR) for psychosis population, this study aimed to identify and characterize distinct neurobiological biotypes within CHR using features from resting-state functional networks. A total of 239 participants from the Shanghai At Risk for Psychosis (SHARP) program were enrolled, consisting of 151 CHR individuals and 88 matched healthy controls (HCs). Functional connectivity (FC) features that were correlated with symptom severity were subjected to the single-cell interpretation through multikernel learning (SIMLR) algorithm in order to identify latent homogeneous subgroups. The cognitive function, clinical symptoms, FC patterns, and correlation with neurotransmitter systems of biotype profiles were compared. Three distinct CHR biotypes were identified based on 646 significant ROI-ROI connectivity features, comprising 29.8%, 19.2%, and 51.0% of the CHR sample, respectively. Despite the absence of overall FC differences between CHR and HC groups, each CHR biotype demonstrated unique FC abnormalities. Biotype 1 displayed augmented somatomotor connection, Biotype 2 shown compromised working memory with heightened subcortical and network-specific connectivity, and Biotype 3, characterized by significant negative symptoms, revealed extensive connectivity reductions along with increased limbic-subcortical connectivity. The neurotransmitter correlates differed across biotypes. Biotype 2 revealed an inverse trend to Biotype 3, as increased neurotransmitter concentrations improved functional connectivity in Biotype 2 but reduced it in Biotype 3. The identification of CHR biotypes provides compelling evidence for the early manifestation of heterogeneity within the psychosis spectrum, suggesting that distinct pathophysiological mechanisms may underlie these subgroups.

Identifiers

PMID39905003
PMCPMC11794858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.