ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Evolving prognostic paradigms in lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastases: a web-based predictive model enhanced by machine learning.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The flavonoid astragalin induces apoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma and correlates with a prognostic cell cycle gene signature associated with PANoptosis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPatients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) who develop brain metastases (BM) face significantly poor prognoses. A well-crafted prognostic model could greatly assist clinicians in patient counseling and in devising tailored therapeutic strategies.
methodsThe study cohort comprised LUAD patients with BM identified from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database between 2000 and 2018. We pinpointed independent prognostic features for overall survival (OS) using Lasso regression analyses. Predictive models were built using Random Forest, XGBoost, Decision Trees, and Artificial Neural Networks, with their performance evaluated via metrics including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, brier score, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsWe extracted a total of 9121 eligible patients from the database, identifying eleven clinical parameters that significantly influenced OS prognostication. The XGBoost model exhibited superior discriminative power, achieving AUC values of 0.829 and 0.827 for 1- and 2-year survival, respectively, in the training cohort, and 0.816 and 0.809 in the validation cohort. In comparison to other models, the XGBoost model excelled in both training and validation phases, as demonstrated by substantial differences in AUC, DCA, calibration, and Brier score. This model has been made accessible via a web-based platform.
conclusionsThis study has developed an XGBoost-based machine learning model with an accompanying web-based application, providing a novel resource for clinicians to support personalized decision-making and enhance treatment outcomes for LUAD patients with BM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.