Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39904926›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025

The potential of Paraburkholderia species to enhance crop growth.

Fernando Uriel Rojas-Rojas, Ingrid Melissa Gómez-Vázquez, Paulina Estrada-de Los Santos, Harumi Shimada-Beltrán, Julio C Vega-Arreguín

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic diversity of culturableMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biocontrol ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fernando Uriel Rojas-RojasLaboratorio de Ciencias AgroGenómicas, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad León, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (ENES-León, UNAM), Blvd. UNAM 2011, 37684, León, Guanajuato, México.
Ingrid Melissa Gómez-VázquezLaboratorio de Ciencias AgroGenómicas, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad León, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (ENES-León, UNAM), Blvd. UNAM 2011, 37684, León, Guanajuato, México.
Paulina Estrada-de Los SantosDepartamento de Microbiología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prol. de Carpio y Plan de Ayala S/N Col. Santo Tomás Alc., 11340, Miguel Hidalgo, Ciudad de México, México.
Harumi Shimada-BeltránLaboratorio de Ciencias AgroGenómicas, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad León, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (ENES-León, UNAM), Blvd. UNAM 2011, 37684, León, Guanajuato, México.
Julio C Vega-ArreguínLaboratorio de Ciencias AgroGenómicas, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad León, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (ENES-León, UNAM), Blvd. UNAM 2011, 37684, León, Guanajuato, México. jvega@enes.unam.mx.

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías A1-S-34759Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México IG200921Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,Mexico IN218024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agrochemicals are the primary alternative for maintaining the high yields necessary to produce sufficient plant-based foods to supply the world population. In recent decades, one of the most extensively explored alternatives to replace agrochemicals and reduce their environmental impact has been the use of microorganism-based products to boost crop yields with less environmental impact. This review focuses on the results of studies that have demonstrated the potential of the genus Paraburkholderia to increase crop yields and be utilized in biofertilizers and biocontrol products. A literature search was performed electronically considering articles and books published until August 19, 2024. We identified 24 species of Paraburkholderia with the ability to improve crop yields after their inoculation by different methods on seeds, seedlings, plantlets, adult crops, or fruits. The effects of these bacteria have been tested under laboratory, greenhouse, or field conditions. These Paraburkholderia species mediate their positive impact on crop growth by direct and indirect plant growth-promoting mechanisms, which include improving nutrient uptake, stimulating growth by phytohormone production, regulation and stimulation of metabolic pathways, induction of abiotic stress tolerance, and disease control by direct pathogen inhibition or induction of systemic resistance in plants. The literature reviewed here supports the use of Paraburkholderia in bio-inputs under the actual panorama of climate change and the necessity to increase sustainable agriculture worldwide.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalRhizobiaceaePlant Growth RegulatorsPlant Growth RegulatorsBiocontrolBiofertilizerCropPGPR

Identifiers

PMID39904926
PMCPMC11794353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.