ArticleESC heart failure2025
Assessment of frailty in patients with heart failure: A new Heart Failure Frailty Score developed by Delphi consensus.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of different mind-body exercises on functional capacity and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy among patients with acute heart failure admitted to cardiac rehabilitation: the PROMETEO registry.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Mapping interventions addressing frailty and associated outcomes in people with heart failure: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Palliative Care in Advanced Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Frailty assessment and candidate optimization before cardiothoracic transplantation.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Core Competencies of the Modern Geriatric Cardiologist: A Framework for Comprehensive Cardiovascular Care in Older Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Physical Frailty Versus the MECKI Score in Risk Stratification of Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: Simpler Measure, Similar Insights?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Multidimensional and Multidisciplinary Management of Heart Failure Patients with Frailty.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
- Identification of frailty heterogeneity and its transition trajectories in patients with chronic heart failure: a latent transition analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Risk Stratification Tools in Acute Heart Failure and Their Roles in Personalized Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Effect of Personalized Health Coaching Program in Patients With Frailty and Heart Failure: Rationale and Study Design.International journal of heart failure · 2025Article
- Assessment of frailty in patients with heart failure: A new Heart Failure Frailty Score developed by Delphi consensus.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
61 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe Heart Failure Frailty Score (HFFS) is a novel, multidimensional tool to assess frailty in patients with heart failure (HF). It has been developed to overcome limitations of existing frailty assessment tools while being practical for clinical use. The HFFS reflects the concept of frailty as a multidimensional, dynamic and potentially reversible state, which increases vulnerability to stressors and risk of poor outcomes in patients with HF. METHODS AND
resultsThe HFFS was developed through a Delphi consensus process involving 54 international experts. This approach involved iterative rounds of questionnaires and interviews, where a panel of experts provided their opinions on specific questions prepared by the Steering Committee. The experts were invited to vote and share their views anonymously, using a 5-point Likert scale over iterative rounds. An 80% threshold was set for agreement or disagreement for each statement. Twenty-two variables from four domains (clinical, functional, psycho-cognitive and social) have been selected for inclusion in the HFFS after the third round of the Delphi process. A shorter version (S-HFFS), including 10 variables, has also been developed for daily clinical use.
conclusionsThe HFFS is a new multidimensional tool for the identification of frailty in patients with HF. It should also enables healthcare providers to identify potential 'red flags' for frailty in order to develop personalized care plans. The next step will be to validate the new score in patients with HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.