ReviewMikrochimica acta2025
Biomimetic separations in chemistry and life sciences.
Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of a liposome electrokinetic capillary chromatography system for surrogation of cell membrane partitions.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Driven QSRR Modeling of Albumin Binding in Fluoroquinolones: An SVR Approach Supported by HSA Chromatography.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Development of Prediction Capabilities for High-Throughput Screening of Physiochemical Properties by Biomimetic Chromatography.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- µ-Raman Spectroscopic Temperature Dependence Study of Biomimetic Lipid 1,2-Diphytanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Different chromatographic techniques and recent advancements for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since Otto Schmitt introduced the term "biomimetics" in 1957, the imitation of biological systems to develop separation methods and simulate biological processes has seen continuous growth, particularly over the past five decades. The biomimetic approach relies on the use of specific ligands-biospecific, biomimetic, or synthetic-which target biomolecules, such as proteins, antibodies, nucleic acids, enzymes, drugs, pesticides, and other bioactive analytes. This review highlights advances in biomimetic separations, focusing on biomimetic liquid chromatography (including immobilized artificial membrane chromatography, cell membrane chromatography, biomimetic affinity chromatography, weak affinity chromatography, micellar liquid chromatography, immobilized liposome chromatography, and liposome electrokinetic capillary chromatography) for the complex separation and purification of biomolecules and other important chemical compounds. It also explores their application in studying drug-receptor interactions, screening chemical permeability, absorption, distribution, toxicity, as well as predicting environmental risks. Additionally, this review discusses the application of biomimetic magnetic nanoparticles, which leverage biological membranes and proteins for drug discovery, protein purification, and diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.