ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) of Extraperitoneal Abdominal Disease, is it Appropriate?
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pseudomyxoma Peritonei: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCytoreductive surgery-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) candidates often have extraperitoneal abdominal disease. Current expert peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) guidelines recommend that the presence of extraperitoneal disease is a contraindication to CRS-HIPEC.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of our institutional appendiceal and colorectal CRS-HIPEC registries. Two study cohorts were constructed: (1) cytoreduction with extraperitoneal abdominal disease, and (2) cytoreductions limited to peritoneal structures alone. The primary study outcome was survival. Subgroup analysis was based on the primary tumor and completeness of cytoreduction.
resultsOverall, 864 CRS-HIPEC cases were evaluated, consisting of 578 appendiceal primaries and 286 colorectal cancers. The extraperitoneal cohort included 101 patients, with 763 patients in the non-extraperitoneal group. The median follow-up time was 13.18 years. The main analysis showed no significant differences in survival times. For overall survival (OS) there was a mean OS time of 5.87 years and a median OS time of 4.43 years for extraperitoneal cytoreductions compared with a mean of 5.90 years and a median of 4.76 years for non-extraperitoneal cytoreductions (p = 0.955). Five-year OS rates did not differ at 49.1% versus 49.5% (odds ratio [OR] 1.036, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.671-1.597, p = 0.874). Disease-free survival (DFS) times showed a mean of 4.40 years and a median of 1.93 years for extraperitoneal cases versus a mean of 5.44 years and a median of 3.05 years for non-extraperitoneal cases (p = 0.210). Five-year DFS rates also showed no differences (OR 0.894, 95% CI 0.476-1.681, p = 0.728). No significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS)Pp times (p = 0.061) were reported. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that extraperitoneal CRS was not an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.281, 95% CI 0.885-1.854, p = 0.190), DFS (HR 1.087, 95% CI 0.694-1.701, p = 0.716), or PFS (HR 0.650, 95% CI 0.243-1.738).
conclusionWe conducted the largest analysis evaluating extraperitoneal cytoreductions, with no significant differences in almost all survival outcomes. We propose that the presence of extraperitoneal abdominal disease is not a contraindication to proceeding with CRS-HIPEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.