Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39904811›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Artificial intelligence in radiology : Literature overview and reading recommendations].

Moritz C Halfmann, Peter Mildenberger, Tobias Jorg

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Moritz C HalfmannKlinik und Poliklinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsmedizin, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Peter MildenbergerKlinik und Poliklinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsmedizin, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Tobias JorgKlinik und Poliklinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsmedizin, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. Tobias.jorg@unimedizin-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the ongoing rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models (LLMs), radiologists will soon face the challenge of the responsible clinical integration of these models.

objectivesThe aim of this work is to provide an overview of current developments regarding LLMs, potential applications in radiology, and their (future) relevance and limitations. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis review analyzes publications on LLMs for specific applications in medicine and radiology. Additionally, literature related to the challenges of clinical LLM use was reviewed and summarized.

resultsIn addition to a general overview of current literature on radiological applications of LLMs, several particularly noteworthy studies on the subject are recommended.

conclusionsIn order to facilitate the forthcoming clinical integration of LLMs, radiologists need to engage with the topic, understand various application areas, and be aware of potential limitations in order to address challenges related to patient safety, ethics, and data protection.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiologyHumansChat-GPTClinical integrationLarge language modelsPatient safetyStructured reporting

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.