ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025
Has a fast treatment transition from surgical to endovascular operations improved the survival of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral studies have attributed decreasing case fatality rates (CFRs) of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) to the gradually increasing use of endovascular treatment without considering improvements in other outcome-affecting factors. To assess the independent effect of a treatment modality on CFRs, we investigated CFR changes in a high-volume center rapidly transitioning from surgical to endovascular operations as the first-line treatment for all aSAH patients except those with middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms.
methodsWe identified all surgically/endovascularly treated aSAH patients in Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) during 2012-2017. As the treatment shift occurred in 2015, we defined two treatment eras: surgical (2012-2014) and endovascular (2015-2017). We compared time-dependent changes in 1-year CFRs between non-MCA and MCA patients using a Poisson regression model. To analyze consistency in operation rates, we also identified sudden-death and conservatively treated aSAHs in the HUH catchment area via two externally validated registers.
resultsOf all 665 hospitalized aSAH cases in the HUH catchment area, 557 (84%) received operative treatment; 367 (66%) underwent surgical and 190 (34%) endovascular operations. Between the treatment eras, endovascular treatment for non-MCA cases increased from 21 to 79%, whereas 99% of the MCA cases were treated surgically during the whole study-period. Among the operatively treated patients, the 1-year CFRs decreased similarly in patients with non-MCA (42%; from 14 to 8%; adjusted risk ratio (aRR) = 0.66 (95% CI 0.37-1.19)) and MCA aneurysms (42%; from 15 to 9%; aRR = 0.66 (0.16-1.60)). The proportion of operatively treated patients, their clinical condition on admission, and amount of bleeding on the first CT-scan remained unchanged over time.
conclusionsWe found similar CFR decreases in aSAH groups with and without undergoing a fast transition from surgery to endovascular operations, providing real-world evidence on the small independent effect of endovascular treatment on the decreasing CFRs in high-volume centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.