ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025
Validating the modified Canadian Preoperative Prediction Rule for Hydrocephalus for accurate hydrocephalus prediction in a statewide pediatric brain tumor cohort.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting postoperative hydrocephalus in 1,073 posterior fossa tumor patients.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Comparison of various predictive tools in predicting risk of cerebrospinal fluid diversion post-resection of posterior fossa tumors: A systematic review.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Predictors of pre-resection hydrocephalus in posterior cranial fossa tumors: development of a predictive scoring model.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe modified Canadian Preoperative Prediction Rule for Hydrocephalus (mCPPRH) was developed to predict the need for permanent CSF diversion in children with posterior fossa tumors (PFT). This study aimed to externally validate the mCPPRH in a cohort of 113 pediatric patients with PFTs.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis, calculating the mCPPRH score for each patient and performing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess the tool's discriminative ability. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated using a cutoff score of ≥ 5. Multivariable logistic regression with bidirectional stepwise selection was used to evaluate individual components of the score. The mCPPRH components were modified and the performance of adjusted tools was compared to the original.
resultsOf the 113 patients, 35 (31.0%) required permanent CSF diversion. The mCPPRH demonstrated acceptable discriminative ability (AUC = 0.701, 95% CI 0.608-0.795, p < 0.0003). Sensitivity was 34.1%, specificity 89.7%, positive predictive value 60%, and negative predictive value 75.3%. Initial regression identified no significant predictors. In stepwise regression, moderate-severe hydrocephalus independently predicted permanent CSF diversion (OR 6.37, 95% CI 1.71-41.55, p = 0.02). Increasing the age cutoff to < 5 years, removing tumor diagnosis, and modifying hydrocephalus weighting improved performance (AUC = 0.768, sensitivity 71.4%, specificity 75.6%).
conclusionsThe mCPPRH demonstrates acceptable discriminative ability (AUC 0.701) in our cohort, with particular utility in identifying low-risk patients. However, its poor sensitivity (34.1%) and variable predictor performance suggest that additional clinical factors should be considered for treatment planning, particularly in higher-risk cases. Further modification of mCPPRH components is suggested to improve its utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39904764What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.