Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39904721›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2025

A scoping review on the impact of women's global leadership: evidence to inform health leadership.

Anna Kalbarczyk, Katherine Banchoff, Kelly E Perry, Charlotte Pram Nielsen, Anju Malhotra, Rosemary Morgan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna KalbarczykDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA akalbarc@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6143-8634
Katherine BanchoffDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kelly E PerryDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Charlotte Pram NielsenGlobal Financing Facility, World Bank Group, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Anju MalhotraDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Rosemary MorganDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe documented benefits of gender parity in leadership are emerging-women leaders have been shown to have a positive impact on maternal and health care policies, strengthen health facilities, and reduce health inequalities. More research is needed, however, to document their impact on global health. We go beyond the well-documented barriers that uphold the lack of gender parity by identifying areas where women leaders are making an impact to inform investment, programming, and policy.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, to map evidence on the impact of women's leadership in organisations in low- and middle-income countries. As many leadership outcomes are cross-disciplinary, outcomes were explored across sectors with particular attention paid to the relevance of these outcomes for global health.

results137 articles were included in the review. Studies found women leaders' positive influence on six areas of impact: (1) financial performance, risk, and stability, (2) innovation, (3) engagement with ethical initiatives, (4) health, (5) organisational culture and climate outcomes, and (6) influence on other women's careers and aspirations. Articles reporting mixed results focused on multiple indicators and still largely pointed to positive results, particularly when modified by other factors including increased education, increased experience, and opportunities to work with other women across the organisation. In all sectors, across leadership roles, and across geographies, women's leadership can produce positive results. Women leaders' success, however, cannot be separated from the contexts in which they work, and unsupportive environments can affect the extent to which women leaders can have an impact.

conclusionIncreased and sustained investment in women's leadership within the health sector can lead to improved outcomes for organisations and their clients. Such investments must not only target individual women, but also seek to foster organisational cultures that promote and retain women leaders and support their independent decision-making.

Indexed as

Global HealthLeadershipFemaleHumansDecision MakingGlobal HealthHealth systemsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39904721
PMCPMC13059957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.