ArticleJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2025
Differential Mobility Spectrometry Authenticates the Botanical Origins of Five Monofloral Honeys.
Article in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) enables the detection and separation of volatile organic compounds, exploiting differences in ion mobility under varying electric fields, which enhance the resolution of complex mixtures. In this study, DMS, upon integration with chemometrics, enabled the differentiation of the botanical origins of Italian honeys. Utilizing a benchtop differential mobility spectrometer connected to pure air, 219 monofloral honeys of five different botanical origins (acacia, chestnut, citrus, eucalyptus, and linden) were simultaneously analyzed in positive and negative ion modes and with the analysis duration of less than 2 min. Repeatability of the resultant volatilomic fingerprints was verified by cosine similarity with the subsequent elimination of the nonrepeatable data. Afterward, the data for both polarities were concatenated, and an exploratory investigation was carried out into the discrimination capabilities of DMS by principal component analysis. The merged data were then submitted to a statistical analysis for classification. The performance of the resultant random forest (RF) classifier was evaluated by repeated cross-validation and resubstitution into the training set, and finally, this classifier was validated on a withheld subset of data. The performances of the classification model for each test were evaluated by calculating the contingency table-derived parameters of accuracy, Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC), sensitivity, and specificity. The RF classifier produced high-performance values when predicting the botanical origin of the honey in both training (MCC 84.8%, accuracy 88.0%, sensitivity 87.5%, and specificity 96.9%) and validation subsets (MCC 82.6%, accuracy 86.3%, sensitivity 85.7%, and specificity 96.5%). Some limitations, expected to be mitigated by further research, were encountered in the correct classification of acacia honey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.