Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39904392›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Affective bodily responses in monkeys predict subsequent pessimism, but not vice versa.

Sakumi Iki, Ikuma Adachi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sakumi IkiCenter for the Evolutionary Origins of Human Behavior, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4863-4179
Ikuma AdachiCenter for the Evolutionary Origins of Human Behavior, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2856-8792

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affect is a complex interplay of behaviour, physiology, cognition and subjective feelings. The James-Lange theory, which posits that affective bodily responses occur first and subsequently shape our affective experiences, has been extensively studied in humans but remains underexplored in non-human animals. This study employs a judgement bias test to explore the relationship between peripheral bodily responses, specifically self-scratching associated with negative affect, and shifts in cognitive information-processing modes (i.e. a 'pessimistic' judgement bias characterized by heightened anticipation of undesirable outcomes) in Japanese macaques (

Indexed as

AffectMacaca fuscataPessimismAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCognitionFemaleJudgmentMalebehavioural contagioncognitive biasdual-process theoryjudgement biasperipheral origin theoryself-directed behaviour

Identifiers

PMID39904392
PMCPMC11793958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.