Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39903910›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025

A Tablet-Based Technology for Objective Exercise Monitoring in Vestibular Rehabilitation: Mixed Methods Study.

Brooke N Klatt, Pedram Hovareshti, Lisa S Holt, Pamela M Dunlap, Chad Zalkin, Devendra Tolani, Susan L Whitney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brooke N KlattDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2310-0330
Pedram HovareshtiBlueHalo, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9002-2013
Lisa S HoltBlueHalo, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3779-0961
Pamela M DunlapDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9181-4533
Chad ZalkinBlueHalo, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5229-8150
Devendra TolaniBlueHalo, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0545-5578
Susan L WhitneyDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4271-8718

Funding

Critical Life K23 Administrative SupplementK23DC020215 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Brooke Klatt · 2022 to 2026
$656k
NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC020215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A low-cost home exercise system called VestAid has been developed to assist participants during vestibulo-ocular reflex gaze stabilization exercises outside of clinic visits. The system includes a tablet-based app for the participant and a web-based portal for the physical therapist that provides data to make judgments about exercise accuracy and performance. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of VestAid in a pilot study of 10 participants (mean age 45 [SD 19] years; 6 women) with various vestibular diagnoses. Methods: All participants completed twelve 30-second horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex exercises in a seated position (6 "easy" and 6 "hard" exercises). The exercises differed by variations in the background color, pattern, and movement. One of the exercises was repeated to assess the test-retest reliability of the measure of gaze stability accuracy and head motion compliance during the exercise. Participants rated the difficulty of the exercises (0-10 where 0=easy, 10=difficult) and completed usability surveys. Results: Participants completed the VestAid session without adverse events. The responses from the usability survey demonstrate the acceptability of VestAid. The mean rating of the "easy" exercises was 2.7/10 (SD 1.9). The mean rating for the "difficult" exercises across participants was 4.8/10 (SD 2.1). Conclusions: The consistency of the mean ratings of the participants with the exercise classifications ("easy" and "difficult") suggests that VestAid has clinical utility.

Indexed as

appclinical usedigital healthe-healthexercisesfeasibilityhome exercisemHealthmobile appmobile healthocularphysical therapyphysiotherapistphysiotherapyrehabilitationtablettechnologytelerehabilitationusability studyvestibularvestibulo-ocular reflexvisionweb-based

Identifiers

PMID39903910
PMCPMC11813194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.