ArticlePhysiological research2024
A Closed Circulation Langendorff Heart Perfusion Method for Cardiac Drug Screening.
Article in Physiological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases represent an economic burden for health systems accounting for substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite timely and costly efforts in drug development, the cardiovascular safety and efficacy of the drugs are not always fully achieved. These lead to the drugs' withdrawal with adverse cardiac effects from the market or in the late stages of drug development. There is a growing need for a cost-effective drug screening assay to rapidly detect potential acute drug cardiotoxicity. The Langendorff isolated heart perfusion technique, which provides cardiac hemodynamic parameters (e.g., contractile function and heart rate), has become a powerful approach in the early drug discovery phase to overcome drawbacks in the drug candidate's identification. However, traditional ex vivo retrograde heart perfusion methods consume a large volume of perfusate, which increases the cost and limits compound screening. An elegant and cost-effective alternative mode for ex vivo retrograde heart perfusion is the constant-flow with a recirculating circuit (CFCC), which allows assessment of cardiac function using a reduced perfusion volume while limiting adverse effects on the heart. Here, we provide evidence for cardiac parameters stability over time in this mode. Next, we demonstrate that our recycled ex vivo perfusion system and the traditional open one yield similar outputs on cardiac function under basal conditions and upon ?-adrenergic stimulation with isoproterenol. Subsequently, we validate the proof of concept of therapeutic agent screening using this efficient method. ?-blocker (i.e., propranolol) infusion in closed circulation countered the positive effects induced by isoproterenol stimulation on cardiac function. Keywords: Drug development, Drug screening, Cardiovascular safety, Langendorff method, Closed circulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39903886PMC11835219What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.