Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39903776›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Interpreting the CTCF-mediated sequence grammar of genome folding with AkitaV2.

Paulina N Smaruj, Fahad Kamulegeya, David R Kelley, Geoffrey Fudenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Recipes and ingredients for deep learning models of 3D genome folding.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paulina N SmarujDepartment of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1002-5140
Fahad KamulegeyaStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0008-1806-6661
David R KelleyCalico Life Sciences LLC, South San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7782-3548
Geoffrey FudenbergDepartment of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5905-6517

Funding

Genomes in 3D: from maps to mechanismsR35GM143116 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FUDENBERG, GEOFFREY · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM143116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interphase mammalian genomes are folded in 3D with complex locus-specific patterns that impact gene regulation. CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor) is a key architectural protein that binds specific DNA sites, halts cohesin-mediated loop extrusion, and enables long-range chromatin interactions. There are hundreds of thousands of annotated CTCF-binding sites in mammalian genomes; disruptions of some result in distinct phenotypes, while others have no visible effect. Despite their importance, the determinants of which CTCF sites are necessary for genome folding and gene regulation remain unclear. Here, we update and utilize Akita, a convolutional neural network model, to extract the sequence preferences and grammar of CTCF contributing to genome folding. Our analyses of individual CTCF sites reveal four predictions: (i) only a small fraction of genomic sites are impactful; (ii) impact is highly dependent on sequences flanking the core CTCF binding motif; (iii) core and flanking nucleotides contribute largely additively to the overall impact of a site; (iv) sites created as combinations of different core and flanking sequences have impacts proportional to the product of their average impacts, i.e. they are broadly compatible. Our analysis of collections of CTCF sites make two predictions for multi-motif grammar: (i) insulation strength depends on the number of CTCF sites within a cluster, and (ii) pattern formation is governed by the orientation and spacing of these sites, rather than any inherent specialization of the CTCF motifs themselves. In sum, we present a framework for using neural network models to probe the sequences instructing genome folding and provide a number of predictions to guide future experimental inquiries.

Indexed as

CCCTC-Binding FactorGenomeAnimalsBinding SitesChromatinComputational BiologyHumansNeural Networks, ComputerCCCTC-Binding FactorChromatinCTCF protein, human

Identifiers

PMID39903776
PMCPMC11828424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.