ArticlePloS one2025
Three-dimensional analysis using a dental model scanner: Morphological changes of occlusal appliances used for sleep bruxism under dry and wet conditions.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study used a dental model scanner and best-fit alignment to analyze the deformation patterns of stabilized occlusal appliances (OcAs) used to treat sleep bruxism when stored in wet or dry conditions.
methodsEight OcAs were prepared using polymethyl methacrylate, stored in water at room temperature for 4 weeks (wet storage), and then in air for 4 weeks (dry storage). After being stored in water for one month for hydration, they were 3D-scanned and digitized on days 0, 28, and 56. 3D-deformation patterns were obtained by comparing the storage-D group data using a best-fit alignment program that aligns the nearest points of the corresponding images in a virtual space and calculates the difference between the two images. The maximum deviation and deformed area in the ± direction, and the volume of the wet (W) and the dry (D) condition groups were compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test.
resultsOcA showed no obvious deformities in the W group at 4 weeks. However, in the D Group, a typical deformation pattern was detected at 4 weeks, with the posterior margin of the molars shrinking anteriorly, the palatal side of the molars lifted, and the buccal side retracted inward. The Ⅾ group was significantly larger than the W groups in terms of maximum deviation in the ± direction, deformed area, and volume.
conclusionsAfter 4 weeks of storage under dry conditions, OcA showed a typical deformation pattern of shrinkage toward the center, with in-center lifting toward the palatal side. Significantly greater surface deviations, deformation areas, and deformation volumes were observed under dry conditions than in wet conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.