Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39903716›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Navigating uncertainty in environmental DNA detection of a nuisance marine macroalga.

Patrick K Nichols, Kaʻuaʻoa M S Fraiola, Alison R Sherwood, Brian B Hauk, Keolohilani H Lopes, Colt A Davis, James T Fumo, Chelsie W W Counsell, Taylor M Williams, Heather L Spalding and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Patrick K NicholsSchool of Life Sciences, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2772-4709
Kaʻuaʻoa M S FraiolaUnited States Geological Survey, Honolulu, HI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3215-6651
Alison R SherwoodSchool of Life Sciences, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, United States of America.
Brian B HaukNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Honolulu, HI, United States of America.
Keolohilani H LopesNatural Resources and Environmental Management, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6116-0655
Colt A DavisCooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, United States of America.
James T FumoSchool of Life Sciences, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, United States of America.
Chelsie W W CounsellCooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, United States of America.
Taylor M WilliamsDepartment of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Heather L SpaldingDepartment of Biology, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Peter B MarkoSchool of Life Sciences, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, United States of America.

Funding

The Control of Insect Metabolism through Nutrition-based SymbiosisP20GM125508 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI Anthony Amend · 2018 to 2026
$21.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM125508NSF NSF DEB-2242142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of nuisance species is crucial for managing threatened ecosystems and preventing widespread establishment. Environmental DNA (eDNA) data can increase the sensitivity of biomonitoring programs, often at minimal cost and effort. However, eDNA analyses are prone to errors that can complicate their use in management frameworks. To address this, eDNA studies must consider imperfect detections and estimate error rates. Detecting nuisance species at low abundances with minimal uncertainty is vital for successful containment and eradication. We developed a novel eDNA assay to detect a nuisance marine macroalga across its colonization front using surface seawater samples from Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument (PMNM), one of the world's largest marine reserves. Chondria tumulosa is a cryptogenic red alga with invasive traits, forming dense mats that overgrow coral reefs and smother native flora and fauna in PMNM. We verified the eDNA assay using site-occupancy detection modeling from quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) data, calibrated with visual estimates of benthic cover of C. tumulosa that ranged from < 1% to 95%. Results were subsequently validated with high-throughput sequencing of amplified eDNA and negative control samples. Overall, the probability of detecting C. tumulosa at occupied sites was at least 92% when multiple qPCR replicates were positive. False-positive rates were 3% or less and false-negative errors were 11% or less. The assay proved effective for routine monitoring at shallow sites (less than 10 m), even when C. tumulosa abundance was below 1%. Successful implementation of eDNA tools in conservation decision-making requires balancing uncertainties in both visual and molecular detection methods. Our results and modeling demonstrated the assay's high sensitivity to C. tumulosa, and we outline steps to infer ecological presence-absence from molecular data. This reliable, cost-effective tool enhances the detection of low-abundance species, and supports timely management interventions.

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalEnvironmental MonitoringRhodophytaSeaweedEcosystemSeawaterUncertaintyDNA, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID39903716
PMCPMC11793909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.