Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39903699›Full record

ReviewThe ISME journal2025

Metabolic labour division trade-offs in denitrifying microbiomes.

Nina Roothans, Mark C M van Loosdrecht, Michele Laureni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ISME journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nina RoothansDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, Delft 2629 HZ, the Netherlands.
Mark C M van LoosdrechtDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, Delft 2629 HZ, the Netherlands.
Michele LaureniDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, van der Maasweg 9, Delft 2629 HZ, the Netherlands.

Funding

Hoogheemraadschap Hollands Noorderkwartier 20.0787440Stichting Toegepast Onderzoek Waterbeheer JG191217009/732.750/CUWaterschap de Dommel Z62737/U131154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Division of metabolic labour is a defining trait of natural and engineered microbiomes. Denitrification-the stepwise reduction of nitrate and nitrite to nitrogenous gases-is inherently modular, catalysed either by a single microorganism (termed complete denitrifier) or by consortia of partial denitrifiers. Despite the pivotal role of denitrification in biogeochemical cycles and environmental biotechnologies, the ecological factors selecting for complete versus partial denitrifiers remain poorly understood. In this perspective, we critically review over 1500 published metagenome-assembled genomes of denitrifiers from diverse and globally relevant ecosystems. Our findings highlight the widespread occurrence of labour division and the dominance of partial denitrifiers in complex ecosystems, contrasting with the prevalence of complete denitrifiers only in simple laboratory cultures. We challenge current labour division theories centred around catabolic pathways, and discuss their limits in explaining the observed niche partitioning. Instead, we propose that labour division benefits partial denitrifiers by minimising resource allocation to denitrification, enabling broader metabolic adaptability to oligotrophic and dynamic environments. Conversely, stable, nutrient-rich laboratory cultures seem to favour complete denitrifiers, which maximise energy generation through denitrification. To resolve the ecological significance of metabolic trade-offs in denitrifying microbiomes, we advocate for mechanistic studies that integrate mixed-culture enrichments mimicking natural environments, multi-meta-omics, and targeted physiological characterisations. These undertakings will greatly advance our understanding of global nitrogen turnover and nitrogenous greenhouse gases emissions.

Indexed as

BacteriaDenitrificationMicrobiotaEcosystemNitratesNitritesNitratesNitritesdenitrificationgenome-resolved metagenomicslabour divisiontrade-off

Identifiers

PMID39903699
PMCPMC11844250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.