ArticleBiology of reproduction2025
Deletion of an evolutionarily conserved TAD boundary impacts spermatogenesis in mice†.
Article in Biology of reproduction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The 3D genome during germline development and meiosis.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2026Review
- Distinguishing benign from pathogenic duplications involving GPR101 and VGLL1-adjacent enhancers in the clinical setting with the bioinformatic tool POSTRE.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Epigenetic regulation by DNA methylation, histone modifications and chromatin remodeling complexes in controlling spermatogenesis and their dysfunction with male infertility.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Review
- Sericin Enhances Cryopreserved Sperm Quality in Chengde Hornless Black Goats by Increasing Glutamine Metabolism.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Genome Mountaineering: Expanding Horizons of the 3D Genome for the Intrepid Evolutionary Adventurer.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spermatogenesis is a complex process that can be disrupted by genetic and epigenetic changes, potentially leading to male infertility. Recent research has rapidly increased the number of coding mutations causally linked to impaired spermatogenesis in humans and mice. However, the role of noncoding mutations remains largely unexplored. To evaluate the effects of noncoding mutations on spermatogenesis, we first identified an evolutionarily conserved topologically associated domain boundary near two genes with important roles in mammalian testis function: Dmrtb1 and Lrp8. We then used CRISPR-Cas9 to generate a mouse line where 26 kb of the boundary was removed including a strong and evolutionarily conserved CTCF binding site. ChIP-seq and Hi-C experiments confirmed the removal of the CTCF site and a resulting mild increase in the DNA-DNA interactions across the domain boundary. Mutant mice displayed significant changes in testis gene expression, a higher frequency of histological abnormalities, a drop of 47-52% in efficiency of meiosis, a 15-18% reduction in efficiency of spermatogenesis, and, consistently, a 12-28% decrease in daily sperm production compared to littermate controls. Despite these quantitative changes in testis function, mutant mice show no significant changes in fertility. This suggests that noncoding deletions affecting testis gene regulation may have smaller effects on fertility compared to coding mutations of the same genes. Our results demonstrate that disruption of a topologically associated domain boundary can have a negative impact on sperm production and highlight the importance of considering noncoding mutations in the analysis of patients with male infertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.