Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39903655›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2025

Prediction of Vancomycin Area Under the Curve With Trough Concentrations Only: Performance Evaluation of Pediatric Population Pharmacokinetic Models.

Stef Schouwenburg, Tim Preijers, Robert B Flint, Enno D Wildschut, Birgit C P Koch, Brenda C M de Winter, Alan Abdulla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Feasibility of vancomycin AUCFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stef SchouwenburgDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the  Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1835-0749
Tim PreijersDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the  Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6953-0358
Robert B FlintDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the  Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3658-594X
Enno D WildschutDepartment of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Division of Pediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the  Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-5197-2656
Birgit C P KochDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the  Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1202-3643
Brenda C M de WinterDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the  Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4452-8443
Alan AbdullaDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the  Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2158-6376

Funding

Erasmus University Medical Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn pediatric patients, vancomycin plays a pivotal role in combating infections, necessitating precise therapeutic drug monitoring to ensure efficacy and safety. The adoption of model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) has demonstrated potential in optimizing dosing strategies based on the 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24h). However, the predictive performance of population pharmacokinetic models by using only trough concentrations to estimate AUC24h has not been evaluated.

methodsThe predictive performance of 23 vancomycin population pharmacokinetic models was retrospectively evaluated in 2 cohorts: cohort A, 21 patients with postnatal age <50 days; cohort B, 124 patients with postnatal age ≥50 days. Multiple scenarios were investigated by using peak and trough concentration, peak concentration solely, trough concentration solely, or covariate information (a priori). The median AUC24h per patient across all models was used as the true AUC24h.

resultsFor both cohorts, the relative root mean square error (rRMSE) for the AUC24h precision based on trough concentrations was similar to the rRMSE based on a peak and trough sample. For cohort A, the models by Chen, Colin, and Mehrotra showed the best trough-based performance with the lowest relative bias (range, -3.3% to -2.6%) and rRMSE (range, 6.8%-7.3%). For cohort B, the models from Alsultan and Lv illustrated the lowest relative bias (range, 1.75% to -5.4%) and rRMSE (range, 16.6%-15.1%).

conclusionsThis study illustrates that trough concentration-based AUC24h estimation is a feasible approach in vancomycin MIPD. These findings endorse the selected models for advanced MIPD vancomycin therapy in pediatrics, although further investigation into clinical outcomes is recommended.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinArea Under CurveChildChild, PreschoolDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleModels, BiologicalRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinbayesian estimationmodel-informed precision dosingpharmacokineticstherapeutic drug monitoringvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID39903655
PMCPMC12128073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.