Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39903589›Full record

ArticleJMIRx med2025

Converting Organic Municipal Solid Waste Into Volatile Fatty Acids and Biogas: Experimental Pilot and Batch Studies With Statistical Analysis.

Hojjat Borhany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIRx med, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hojjat BorhanyFaculty of Environmental Science, Department of Environmental Science, Informatic, and Statistics, University of Ca' Foscari Venice, Mestre (VE), Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5253-8767

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Italy can augment its profit from biorefinery products by altering the operation of digesters or different designs to obtain more precious bioproducts like volatile fatty acids (VFAs) than biogas from organic municipal solid waste. In this context, recognizing the process stability and outputs through operational interventions and its technical and economic feasibility is a critical issue. Hence, this study involves an anaerobic digester in Treviso in northern Italy. Objective: This research compares a novel line, consisting of pretreatment, acidogenic fermentation, and anaerobic digestion, with single-step anaerobic digestion regarding financial profit and surplus energy. Therefore, a mass flow model was created and refined based on the outputs from the experimental and numerical studies. These studies examine the influence of hydraulic retention time (HRT), pretreatment, biochar addition, and fine-tuned feedstock/inoculum (FS/IN) ratio on bioproducts and operational parameters. Methods: VFA concentration, VFA weight ratio distribution, and biogas yield were quantified by gas chromatography. A t test was then conducted to analyze the significance of dissimilar HRTs in changing the VFA content. Further, a feasible biochar dosage was identified for an assumed FS/IN ratio with an adequately long HRT using the first-order rate model. Accordingly, the parameters for a mass flow model were adopted for 70,000 population equivalents to determine the payback period and surplus energy for two scenarios. We also explored the effectiveness of amendments in improving the process kinetics. Results: Both HRTs were identical concerning the ratio of VFA/soluble chemical oxygen demand (0.88 kg/kg) and VFA weight ratio distribution: mainly, acetic acid (40%), butyric acid (24%), and caproic acid (17%). However, a significantly higher mean VFA content was confirmed for an HRT of 4.5 days than the quantity for an HRT of 3 days (30.77, SD 2.82 vs 27.66, SD 2.45 g-soluble chemical oxygen demand/L), using a t test (t8=-2.68; P=.03; CI=95%). In this research, 83% of the fermented volatile solids were converted into biogas to obtain a specific methane (CH4) production of 0.133 CH4-Nm3/kg-volatile solids. While biochar addition improved only the maximum methane content by 20% (86% volumetric basis [v/v]), the FS/IN ratio of 0.3 volatile solid basis with thermal plus fermentative pretreatment improved the hydrolysis rate substantially (0.57 vs 0.07, 1/d). Furthermore, the biochar dosage of 0.12 g-biochar/g-volatile solids with an HRT of 20 days was identified as a feasible solution. Principally, the payback period for our novel line would be almost 2 years with surplus energy of 2251 megajoules [MJ] per day compared to 45 years and 21,567 MJ per day for single-step anaerobic digestion. Conclusions: This research elaborates on the advantage of the refined novel line over the single-step anaerobic digestion and confirms its financial and technical feasibility. Further, changing the HRT and other amendments significantly raised the VFA concentration and the process kinetics and stability.

Indexed as

anaerobic digestionbiocharenvironment sustainabilityfirst-orderkinetics studymass balancemodified Gompertzmultistep fermentationspecific methane productionwaste management

Identifiers

PMID39903589
PMCPMC11812619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.