Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39903474›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2025

Characterizing Electrode Materials and Interfaces in Solid-State Batteries.

Elif Pınar Alsaç, Douglas Lars Nelson, Sun Geun Yoon, Kelsey Anne Cavallaro, Congcheng Wang, Stephanie Elizabeth Sandoval, Udochukwu D Eze, Won Joon Jeong, Matthew T McDowell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interfacial Failure and Self-Healing in Solid-State Batteries.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Reducing Voltage Hysteresis of FeFAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Tuning the Ion Transfer Behavior to Approaching Near-Unity LiSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Grain Boundary-Driven Lattice Dynamics in a Solid-State Li-Ion Conductor.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. A Si-MoSeAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elif Pınar AlsaçG. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Douglas Lars NelsonSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Sun Geun YoonG. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6222-8962
Kelsey Anne CavallaroG. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Congcheng WangG. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Stephanie Elizabeth SandovalG. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0895-5237
Udochukwu D EzeSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Won Joon JeongSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Matthew T McDowellG. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5552-3456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid-state batteries (SSBs) could offer improved energy density and safety, but the evolution and degradation of electrode materials and interfaces within SSBs are distinct from conventional batteries with liquid electrolytes and represent a barrier to performance improvement. Over the past decade, a variety of imaging, scattering, and spectroscopic characterization methods has been developed or used for characterizing the unique aspects of materials in SSBs. These characterization efforts have yielded new understanding of the behavior of lithium metal anodes, alloy anodes, composite cathodes, and the interfaces of these various electrode materials with solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). This review provides a comprehensive overview of the characterization methods and strategies applied to SSBs, and it presents the mechanistic understanding of SSB materials and interfaces that has been derived from these methods. This knowledge has been critical for advancing SSB technology and will continue to guide the engineering of materials and interfaces toward practical performance.

Identifiers

PMID39903474
PMCPMC11869192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.