Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39903466›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Interoperable Models for Identifying Critically Ill Children at Risk of Neurologic Morbidity.

Christopher M Horvat, Amie J Barda, Eddie Perez Claudio, Alicia K Au, Andrew Bauman, Qingyang Li, Ruoting Li, Neil Munjal, Mark S Wainwright, Tanupat Boonchalermvichien and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christopher M HorvatDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Amie J BardaBarda Analytics Consulting LLC, North Royalton, Ohio.
Eddie Perez ClaudioDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Alicia K AuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Andrew BaumanSeattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Qingyang LiSeattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Ruoting LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Neil MunjalDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Mark S WainwrightSeattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Tanupat BoonchalermvichienDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Harry HochheiserDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Robert S B ClarkDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

The internship in Biomedical Research, Informatics, and Computer Science (iBRIC): Biomedical Informatics and Data Science research experiences for students from Minority Serving InstitutionsT15LM007059 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HARRY S HOCHHEISER · 1987 to 2026
$23.9M
PEDIATRIC NEUROINTENSIVE CARE AND RESUSCITATION RESEARCHT32HD040686 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Robert S B Clark, PATRICK M KOCHANEK · 2000 to 2026
$7.1M
Bio-digital Rapid Alert to Identify NeuromorbidityR01NS118716 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI AU, ALICIA K, CLARK, ROBERT S B · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040686NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS118716NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Decreasing mortality in the field of pediatric critical care medicine has shifted practicing clinicians' attention to preserving patients' neurodevelopmental potential as a main objective. Earlier identification of critically ill children at risk for incurring neurologic morbidity would facilitate heightened surveillance that could lead to timelier clinical detection, earlier interventions, and preserved neurodevelopmental trajectory. Objectives: To develop machine-learning models for identifying acquired neurologic morbidity in hospitalized pediatric patients with critical illness and assess correlation with contemporary serum-based, brain injury-derived biomarkers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study used data from all children admitted to a quaternary pediatric intensive care unit in a large, freestanding children's hospital in Western Pennsylvania between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022. External model validation used data from children admitted between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2023, to a quaternary pediatric intensive care unit in a large, freestanding children's hospital that serves as a referral center for the 5-state region of Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho. Exposures: Critical illness. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was neurologic morbidity, defined according to a computable, composite definition at the development site or an order for neurocritical care consultation at the validation site. Models were developed using varying time windows for temporal feature engineering and varying censored time horizons between the last feature and the identified neurologic morbidity. A generalizable model created at the development site was optimized and assessed at an external validation site. Correlation was assessed between development site model predictions and measurements of brain biomarkers from a convenience cohort. Results: After exclusions, there were 18 568 encounters from 2010 to 2022 in the development site generalizable model cohort (median age, 70 [IQR, 18-161] months; 8325 [45%] female). There were 6825 encounters from 2018 to 2021 at the external validation site (median age, 96 [IQR 18-171] months; 3159 [46%] female). A generalizable extreme gradient boosted model with a 24-hour time horizon and 48-hour feature engineering window demonstrated an F1 score of 0.37 (95% CI, 0.33-0.40), area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.78-0.83), and number needed to alert of 4 at the validation site. After recalibration at the validation site, the Brier score was 0.04. Serum levels of the brain injury biomarker glial fibrillary acidic protein significantly correlated with model output (rs = 0.34; P = .007). Conclusions and Relevance: This prognostic study of prediction models for detecting neurologic morbidity in critically ill children demonstrated a well-performing ensemble of models with biomolecular corroboration. Prospective assessment and refinement of biomarker-coupled risk models in pediatric critical illness are warranted.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessMachine LearningNervous System DiseasesAdolescentBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantIntensive Care Units, PediatricMalePrognosisRisk AssessmentBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID39903466
PMCPMC11795326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.