ArticleEnvironmental entomology2025
A phloem-limited RNA phytovirus infection does not positively modulate vector preference and fitness in primary and alternate hosts.
Article in Environmental entomology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colonizing aphids play an important role in the transmission of RNA phytoviruses in the family Solemoviridae. According to "host manipulation hypothesis," phloem limited and persistently transmitted Solemoviridae viruses modulate host physiology that positively affects vector behavior and fitness and facilitates virus spread. However, it is unclear if virus-modulated host effects on vectors across pathosystems involving Solemoviridae members are always positive. Cotton leafroll dwarf virus (CLRDV) is a recently introduced Solemoviridae member in the United States, and it is transmitted by the cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii). Effects of CLRDV infection on vector behavior and fitness were evaluated on its primary host plant, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), and an alternate host plant, hibiscus (Hibiscus acetosella). In this study, changes to viruliferous and non-viruliferous aphid preference and aphid fitness on virus-infected and non-infected hosts were examined. In contrast to the hypothesized preference of non-viruliferous aphids for infected plants and vice-versa, both viruliferous and non-viruliferous A. gossypii preferred non-infected cotton and hibiscus plants over CLRDV-infected plants. This suggested that the preference of non-viruliferous vectors to non-infected plants might negatively impact virus acquisition, whereas the preference of viruliferous vectors toward non-infected plants could positively facilitate virus inoculation. The total fecundity and intrinsic rate of increase of aphids were higher on non-infected plants compared with CLRDV-infected plants. The lack of enhanced fitness benefits on CLRDV-infected hosts also could negatively impact virus spread. Overall, this study suggested that "host manipulation hypothesis" favoring vector attraction and enhanced fitness on infected plants does not apply to all pathosystems involving Solemoviridae members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.