ReviewCJEM2025
POCUS literature primer: key papers on aorta and deep vein thrombosis POCUS.
Review in CJEM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study is to identify the top five most influential papers published on the use of aorta point of care ultrasound (POCUS) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) POCUS in adult patients.
methodsA 15-member expert panel was recruited from the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Emergency Ultrasound Committee and the Canadian Ultrasound Fellowship Collaborative. The members of the expert panel all have ultrasound fellowship training (or equivalent), are active in POCUS research, and provide POCUS leadership locally and nationally. The panel used a modified Delphi process of three rounds of sequential surveys and discussion to achieve consensus on the top five most influential papers on aorta POCUS and DVT POCUS.
resultsAll panel members participated in all three rounds of this modified Delphi process. The panel initially nominated 33 relevant papers on aorta POCUS and 33 relevant papers on DVT POCUS. With the completion of round two, there were 11 candidate papers for aorta POCUS and 14 candidate papers for DVT POCUS. After meeting at the CAEP 2024 annual conference to discuss these papers and to build consensus, the panel ultimately identified the top five most influential papers on aorta POCUS and DVT POCUS after the completion of round three. Included papers focused on the diagnostic test characteristics of POCUS for the workup of suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm and DVT, as well as the clinical impact of POCUS on time to diagnosis and time to disposition in emergency settings.
conclusionThis POCUS Literature Primer has generated a top-five list of the most influential papers on aorta POCUS and DVT POCUS. The papers in these lists can be considered core reading for all trainees and clinicians using these POCUS applications in their practice and serve as a foundation for future POCUS research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39903423What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.