ReviewPrimates; journal of primatology2025
A review of great ape behavioural responses and their outcomes to anthropogenic landscapes.
Review in Primates; journal of primatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Animal cultures matter for conservation, but also to animals.Learning & behavior · 2026Review
- Brokering peace in the ape (culture) wars.Evolutionary human sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Industrial expansion has brought humans and wildlife into closer contact, and added novel, complex dimensions to human-wildlife relationships. The seven great apes (chimpanzee, Bornean orangutan, Sumatran orangutan, Tapanuli orangutan, Eastern gorilla, Western gorilla, bonobo), the closest extant relatives to humans, have experienced substantial population declines resulting from anthropogenic activities. The effect of human activity on great ape behavioural ecology is therefore an emerging field of inquiry in primatology which has historically been minimally considered. This review explores how wild great apes respond behaviourally to human activities and environmental changes, synthesizing current knowledge and addressing potential outcomes and risks. Using precise search criteria, we found 96 studies documenting changes in great ape behaviour in response to human activity, and despite their broad geographic distribution, we found common patterns and responses across species to increasing human influence. Literature documented shifts in existing behaviour (57), the generation of novel behaviours (53) or reported both (15). Forty-three studies (45%) included direct (23) or indirect (20) assessment of the consequences of these behaviours. Only one study modelled a widespread loss of existing behaviours. The majority of studies included chimpanzees (67), followed by orangutans (19) and gorillas (19), and only 2 included bonobos. We found that the most frequently documented drivers of behavioural responses to anthropogenic activity were wide-scale land-use conversions in ape habitats. In response, apes have adopted crop foraging, and altered nesting behaviour, range use, and social strategies. While these responses appear to allow survival in the immediate sense, they may expose individuals to more risks in the long term. Analysis revealed that under many contexts changing great ape behaviour is putting strain on the human-ape relationship, resulting in injury, harassment, and even the killing of apes. We found examples of tolerant relationships between humans and apes shifting towards conflict, potentially worsening the conservation crisis and inviting inquiry into tolerance thresholds among human communities. We emphasize the importance of community-engaged strategies for reducing competition over resources and conclude that great ape behavioural responses to human activity must be interpreted through a locally specific lens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39903403What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.