ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025
Comparison of the mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic and percutaneous nephroscopic laser unroofing for the treatment of single renal cyst: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness and safety of greenlight laser in ureteroscopic parapelvic cyst incision: a retrospective analysis.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones combined with laser endoscopy for ipsilateral renal cysts: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRenal cysts are the most common benign disease of the kidneys, and their increasing size cause compression symptoms that require surgical intervention. In this study, we compared the safety, efficacy and prognosis of percutaneous nephroscopic laser unroofing (PNLU) with those of laparoscopic unroofing (LU) for simple renal cysts.
methodsData from patients with single renal cysts who underwent PNLU or LU between Jan 2018 and Dec 2023 were collected and followed up thereafter. Baseline characteristics, perioperative events, blood test results and postoperative complications were compared. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was also compared via survival analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted in the PNLU group, including the 980 nm laser and Holmium laser groups.
resultsA total of 75 patients were included, 35 of whom underwent PNLU and 40 of whom underwent LU. Compared with LU, PNLU requires only one surgical incision and is a shorter procedure, causes less blood loss, requires fewer urinary catheter days, is known for quicker drainage tube removal, requires a shorter postoperative hospital stay, has lower hospitalization costs, induces a weaker postoperative inflammatory response, and is associated with a lower incidence of abdominal distension. There was no significant difference in RFS between the PNLU and LU groups. In the subgroup analyses of PNLU, no significant differences were observed between the 980 nm laser and Holmium laser groups.
conclusionPNLU is safe, effective and cost-effective for single renal cysts and known for a low complication rate, and its mid-term prognosis is similar to that of laparoscopic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39903379What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.