Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39903371›Full record

ReviewPain and therapy2025

Chronic Pain and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Scoping Review.

Chad Sloley, Caroline Bell, Edward A Shipton, Jonathan Williman, Joanne L Jarvis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chad SloleyDepartment of Anaesthesia, University of Otago, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand. chad.sloley@postgrad.otago.ac.nz.
Caroline BellDepartment of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.
Edward A ShiptonDepartment of Anaesthesia, University of Otago, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6807-2778
Jonathan WillimanDepartment of Population Health, University of Otago, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.
Joanne L JarvisHabit Health, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to map the association between Chronic Pain (CP) and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) in the present literature.

methodsA scoping review was conducted with a comprehensive search of literature in peer-reviewed journals. Search parameters included articles written in English, published at any time, and including terms associated with both CP and OCD. Databases searched for purposes of this study included Psychinfo, Medline, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar.

resultsThe review included 87 records, comprising 49 primary research and 38 secondary research records. Extracted information from these were grouped into four broad classifications. The Prevalence and Severity classification included information from 39 records which comprised: (1) primary research detailing current OCD prevalence rates in CP conditions (differentiated between general population and Pain/Medical/Hospital clinics); (2) primary research detailing lifetime OCD prevalence rates in CP conditions; (3) primary research detailing CP prevalence rates in OCD; (4) primary research detailing relationships between OCD and CP through psychometric measures; and (5) secondary research relating to prevalence rates. The Neurobiology classification included information from 28 records (primary and secondary research) detailing convergent and divergent neurobiological/neurophysiological aspects as reported for both OCD and CP. The Psychological Models/Factors classification included information from 7 records (primary and secondary research) detailing pain-related anxiety, neuropsychological measures, catastrophic thinking, preservative thinking, early maladaptive schemas, schema modes, childhood trauma experiences, and conditional associative learning, as reported for OCD and CP. The Intervention classification included information from 32 records which comprised: (1) primary research on neurosurgical, medication, and psychotherapeutic interventions; (2) secondary research on Deep Brain Stimulation; (3) secondary research on Medication; (4) secondary research on lesion, cingulotomy, and other surgical procedures; and (5) secondary research on other interventional procedures.

conclusionWhile there has been considerable and growing research in the fields of both OCD and CP over the years, focused research into their potential association has been limited and potentially overlooked. The results of this review, however, suggest a complex relationship between CP and OCD. Prevalence rates between the two conditions vary widely across different populations, although the underlying reason for this remains unclear at this stage. There are commonalities in terms of alterations in pain processing, the dysregulation of certain brain regions, and the abnormalities in neurotransmitter systems in both conditions. In their treatment, use can be made of overlapping pathophysiological processes, the convergent and divergent psychological aspects, and the range of interventional approaches that share targets to promote efficacy. However, the complex presentations of both OCD and CP make it a challenging relationship to accurately clarify. Further directed and robust, high-quality studies will be needed to expand our understanding of this area.

Indexed as

Chronic painObsessive–compulsive disorderPain

Identifiers

PMID39903371
PMCPMC11914481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.