Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39903355›Full record

SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025

Prophylactic funnel mesh for preventing parastomal hernia in patients with permanent end stoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bernardo Fontel Pompeu, Lucas Soares de Souza Pinto Guedes, Bruna Maffei Bossi, Lucas Monteiro Delgado, Camila Sigaud Frizzo, Isabelle Rocha Gauch, Fernanda Bellotti Formiga, Sergio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prophylactic Mesh in Parastomal Hernia Prevention: Current Evidence.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bernardo Fontel PompeuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Heliopolis Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. bernardo.pompeu@online.uscs.edu.br.ORCID 0009-0009-2960-3810
Lucas Soares de Souza Pinto GuedesDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Heliopolis Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0008-8437-9682
Bruna Maffei BossiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Heliopolis Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0473-172X
Lucas Monteiro DelgadoFederal University of Minas Gerais - UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0001-7687-3073
Camila Sigaud FrizzoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Heliopolis Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0001-0561-404X
Isabelle Rocha GauchDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Heliopolis Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0866-5467
Fernanda Bellotti FormigaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Heliopolis Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7225-7145
Sergio Mazzola Poli de FigueiredoDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2986-8164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe high incidence of parastomal hernia (PSH) has led surgeons to study strategies to minimize PSH, including prophylactic mesh placement during permanent stoma creation. There are several studies on prophylactic mesh for preventing PSH with conflicting results and there is limited information on using 3D funnel meshes and their effectiveness in preventing PSH.

methodsA search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and Web of Science for studies published up to September 2024. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistics. Statistical analysis was performed using R Software version 4.4.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

resultsOne randomized controlled trial and six observational studies were included, totaling 585 patients who underwent colorectal surgeries requiring a permanent stoma. Of these, 278 patients (47.5%) received prophylactic funnel meshes, and 307 (52.5%) underwent conventional stoma procedures. Compared to conventional procedures without mesh, the funnel mesh group showed significantly lower rates of PSH (9% vs. 54%; OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.03-0.17, p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed in time to PSH development, stoma prolapse, Clavien-Dindo grade 3b complications, stricture, ileus, leak, wound infection, small bowel obstruction, 30-day mortality, operative time, or hospital stay.

conclusionIn patients undergoing colorectal surgery with a permanent end stoma, prophylactic funnel mesh was associated with lower rates of PSH, but findings remain exploratory and limited by current evidence.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralIncisional HerniaPostoperative ComplicationsSurgical MeshSurgical StomasHumansColorectal cancerMeshParastomal herniaStoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.