ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Changes of pharyngeal airway structure and function in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion one year after orthognathic surgery.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Relation of Skeletal Malocclusion and Airway Volumes: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to analyze changes in the pharyngeal airway structure and function in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion one year after orthognathic surgery. MATERIALS/
methodsIn this research, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 30 patients (14 men and 16 women; mean age 20-30 years) with skeletal Class III malocclusion who underwent Lefort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy were obtained before and one year after the surgery. Changes in pharyngeal airway structure were achieved by comparing CBCT data, and changes in function were achieved by comparing fluid dynamics models. The pharyngeal airway was analyzed by Element 3D (E3D) and the nasal airway 3D model was reconstructed. The meshing was implemented in ICEM-CFD (ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA, USA), and improved the mesh quality. The meshes were imported into Fluent (ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA, USA) to stimulate a fluid analysis.
resultsThe minimal anteroposterior diameter, minimal cross-sectional area and volume of pharyngeal airway were significantly reduced after surgery. There was no significant difference in the nasopharyngeal cross-sectional area. Pharyngeal airway resistance increased significantly after surgery, wall shear stress changed little before and after surgery. The anatomic structure of pharyngeal airway changed after surgery, but the morphological change of pharyngeal airway was not significant.
conclusionsOne year after surgery, the anatomical structure and function changed compared with those before surgery, and the changes of minimal cross-sectional area of pharyngeal airway should be considered when designing the treatment plan for the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39903298What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.