ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2025
Evolution of pollutant biodegradation.
Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Horizontal Gene Transfer and Genome Rearrangements Shape Bacterial Adaptation for Bioremediation.Environmental microbiology · 2026Review
- Challenging Evolutionary Paradigms: Daphnia Populations Resurrected From Unpolluted Environments Show Enhanced Detoxification Ability to Aromatic Pollutants.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Novel insecticide-removal activity against deltamethrin and malathion in a lithic-derivedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Pollutant biodegradation profile mediated by multi-trophic microbial dynamics in rivers.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Advanced microbial engineering approaches for biodegradation of pharmaceutical pollutants.Biodegradation · 2025Review
- The Role of the Unusual 2-Tyr-1-carboxylate Non-heme Iron Motif in the Mechanism of N,N-Dimethylformamidase.ACS catalysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pollutant-derived risks to human and environmental health are exacerbated by slow natural attenuation rates, often driven by pollutant toxicity to microorganisms that can degrade them or limitations to the ability of microorganisms to metabolise them. This review explores mechanisms employed by bacteria to protect themselves from pollutant toxicity in the context of the evolution of pollutant-degrading abilities. The role of promiscuous enzymes in pollutant transformation is subsequently reviewed, highlighting the emergence of novel metabolic pathways and their transcriptional regulation in response to pollutant exposure, followed by the gene transcription regulation to optimise the cellular component synthesis for adaptation on the novel substrate. Additionally, we discuss epistatic interactions among mutations vital for this process both at macromolecular and at cellular levels. Finally, evolutionary constraints towards enhanced fitness in the context of pollutant degradation are considered, the constraints imposed by the epistasis from mutations on both enzyme level and cellular level, concluding with challenges and emerging opportunities to develop sustainable contaminated site remediation technologies. KEY POINTS: •Pollutants can exert toxicity on cellular membrane, enzyme and gene transcription. •Bacteria can patch promiscuous enzymes into novel pathway to degrade pollutants. •The evolution trajectory is constrained by epistasis from mutations on enzyme and cellular level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.