ArticleBrain structure & function2025
Gyral peak variations between HCP and CHCP: functional and structural implications.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How Standardized Is Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment for Depression? Large-Cohort Modeling Reveals Systematic Dosimetric Variability.Psychotherapy and psychosomatics · 2026Article
- Altered effective connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and caudate in children with overweight and obesity.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significant culture and ethnic diversity play an important role in shaping brain structure and function. Many attempts have been undertaken to connect ethnic variations with brain function, which, however, fluctuates over time and is costly, limiting its utility to identify consistent brain markers as well as its application to a broad population. In contrast, brain anatomy is less altered during a short period of time, but it is not fully understood whether it could serve as the ethnicity-sensitive landmark, or its variation is associated with functional one. In this study, We utilized gyral peaks, a set of early cortical folds, as cortical landmarks to explore the role of ethnic factors in brain anatomy and their relationship to brain function. Comparative experiments were conducted using the Human Connectome Project and the Chinese Human Connectome Project. In populations with similar ethnic backgrounds, gyral peak patterns showed greater consistency. For groups with significantly different ethnic backgrounds, we identified both shared peaks and peaks unique to each group. Compared to shared peaks, unique peaks showed significant differences in anatomical and functional network attributes and were spatially associated with working memory networks, which exhibited increased activation in their presence. Gene enrichment analysis provided additional support, suggesting that the unique peaks are associated with genes linked to working memory functions. These findings could provide new knowledge to understanding how ethnic diversity interplay with brain functions and associate with brain shapes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39903275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.