Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39903255›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Novel approach of combined endoluminal and external vacuum therapy for wound healing disorders after salvage pharyngeal reconstruction.

Maximilian Gaenzle, Juergen Feisthammel, Markus Pirlich, Andreas Dietz, Matthaeus Stoehr

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maximilian GaenzleDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 12, Haus 1, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. maximilian.gaenzle@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6263-3901
Juergen FeisthammelDepartment of Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Pneumology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Markus PirlichDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 12, Haus 1, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas DietzDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 12, Haus 1, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Matthaeus StoehrDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 12, Haus 1, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatients with recurrent head and neck carcinoma are considered for salvage surgery if resectability with clear margins is achievable. However, postoperative complications such as wound healing disorders and pharyngocutaneous fistulas remain significant challenges. While various reconstructive surgical techniques exist, supportive vacuum therapy-both external and endoluminal-has been explored as an alternative treatment modality. TYPE OF STUDY: We present a case report of a 60-year-old male patient with recurrent laryngeal cancer who underwent salvage laryngopharyngectomy following multiple previous surgical procedures and definitive radiochemotherapy. Due to persistent pharyngocutaneous fistula formation despite multiple reconstructions using pectoralis major flaps, an anterolateral thigh flap, and a fasciocutaneous deltopectoral flap, a novel approach combining endopharyngeal and external vacuum therapy was implemented.

resultsOver six weeks, with vacuum system changes performed twice weekly, the pharyngocutaneous fistula successfully closed, leading to complete wound healing.

conclusionThis case demonstrates the potential effectiveness of a combined endopharyngeal and external vacuum therapy approach for treating persistent pharyngocutaneous fistulas when conventional surgical options are exhausted. Notably, the patient was able to resume oral food consumption following therapy, highlighting the functional benefits of this novel treatment strategy.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellCutaneous FistulaLaryngeal NeoplasmsLaryngectomyNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPharyngeal DiseasesPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsSalvage TherapyWound HealingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharyngectomySurgical FlapsEndoscopic negative pressure therapyPharyngocutaneous fistulaSalvage laryngopharyngectomyVacuum therapy

Identifiers

PMID39903255
PMCPMC12122627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.