ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Age-stratified deep learning model for thyroid tumor classification: a multicenter diagnostic study.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vein-protection-first strategy revolutionizes submental artery perforator flap harvest success: the A-B-C technique and training assessment.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of thyroid diseases: applications and challenges.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Review
- Evaluating Diagnostic Strategies for Thyroid Nodule Assessment Using S-Detect in Transverse and Longitudinal Ultrasound Planes.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThyroid cancer, the only cancer that uses age as a specific predictor of survival, is increasing in incidence, yet it has a low mortality rate, which can lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. We developed an age-stratified deep learning (DL) model (hereafter, ASMCNet) for classifying thyroid nodules and aimed to investigate the effect of age stratification on the accuracy of a DL model, exploring how ASMCNet can help radiologists improve diagnostic performance and avoid unnecessary biopsies.
methodsIn this retrospective study, we used ultrasound images from three hospitals, a total of 10,391 images of 5934 patients were used for training, validation, and testing. The performance of ASMCNet was compared with that of model-trained non-age-stratified radiologists with different experience levels on the test data set with the DeLong method.
resultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity of ASMCNet were 0.906, 86.1%, and 85.1%, respectively, which exceeded those of model-trained non-age-stratified (0.867, 83.2%, and 75.5%, respectively; p < 0.001) and higher than all of the radiologists (p < 0.001). Reader studies show that radiologists' performances are improved when assisted by the explaining heatmaps (p < 0.001).
conclusionsOur study demonstrates that age stratification based on DL can further improve the performance of thyroid tumor classification models, which also suggests that age is an important factor in the diagnosis of thyroid tumors. The ASMCNet model shows promising clinical applicability and can assist radiologists in improving diagnostic accuracy. KEY POINTS: Question Age is crucial for differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) prognosis, yet its diagnostic impact lacks research. Findings Adding age stratification to DL models can further improve the accuracy of thyroid nodule diagnosis. Clinical relevance Age-stratified multimodal classification network is a reliable tool used to help radiologists diagnose thyroid nodules, and integrating it into clinical practice can improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce unnecessary biopsies or treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39903238What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.