ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Pseudo-MRI Engine for MRI-Free Electromagnetic Source Imaging.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Template-Based Analysis of Age-Dependent Cortical Eigenmodes and Scalp EEG Forward Transfer in Infancy.Brain topography · 2026Article
- Fifteen years on: a review of the Cam-CAN study of the cognitive neuroscience of ageing.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Multimodal quantitative analysis guides precise preoperative localization of epilepsy.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Source reconstruction without an MRI using optically pumped magnetometer-based magnetoencephalography.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural head MRIs are a crucial ingredient in MEG/EEG source imaging; they are used to define a realistically shaped volume conductor model, constrain the source space, and visualize the source estimates. However, individual MRIs are not always available, or they may be of insufficient quality for segmentation, leading to the use of a generic template MRI, matched MRI, or the application of a spherical conductor model. Such approaches deviate the model geometry from the true head structure and limit the accuracy of the forward solution. Here, we implemented an easy-to-use tool, pseudo-MRI engine, which utilizes the head-shape digitization acquired during a MEG/EEG measurement for warping an MRI template to fit the subject's head. To this end, the algorithm first removes outlier digitization points, densifies the point cloud by interpolation if needed, and finally warps the template MRI and its segmented surfaces to the individual head shape using the thin-plate-spline method. To validate the approach, we compared the geometry of segmented head surfaces, cortical surfaces, and canonical brain regions in the real and pseudo-MRIs of 25 subjects. We also tested the MEG source reconstruction accuracy with pseudo-MRIs against that obtained with the real MRIs from individual subjects with simulated and real MEG data. We found that the pseudo-MRI enables comparable source localization accuracy to the one obtained with the subject's real MRI. The study indicates that pseudo-MRI can replace the need for individual MRI scans in MEG/EEG source imaging for applications that do not require subcentimeter spatial accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.