ReviewEuropean journal of neurology2025
Tirofiban Benefits the Outcome of Stroke Patients With Large Artery Atherosclerosis Achieving Full Reperfusion and High NIHSS Scores.
Review in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Prestroke Antiplatelet Therapy on the Efficacy of Intravenous Tirofiban at Preventing Early Neurological Deterioration: A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of the TREND Trial.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026Trial
- Revisiting Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Carotid Tandem Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Associations of Folate and Homocysteine Levels with Futile Recanalization in Acute Ischemic Stroke After Successful Endovascular Thrombectomy.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Review
- Predictors of infarction and outcomes in capsular warning syndrome: a retrospective observational study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Infarct growth rate predicts functional outcome after successful mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.