Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39902654›Full record

ArticleEcology2025

Mean plant toxicity modulates the effects of plant defense variability.

Vincent S Pan, Kadeem J Gilbert, William C Wetzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vincent S PanDepartment of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9892-7805
Kadeem J GilbertDepartment of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
William C WetzelDepartment of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-6824

Funding

KBS Graduate Student Summer FellowshipMSU University Distinguished FellowshipNSF Graduate Research Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant trait variation is thought to suppress herbivore performance, but experiments typically manipulate only a single mean level of the trait. We manipulated the mean and variation of the concentration of a plant toxin in a model plant-herbivore system across three field and greenhouse experiments. Plants with leaves painted with a higher mean toxin concentration exhibited increased fitness and resistance to herbivores; however, at high mean concentrations, variation reduced the defensive effect, while at lower mean concentrations, variation enhanced it. This reversal aligns with models that include herbivore food selectivity, but our simulations revealed that the benefits of food selectivity for herbivores were minimal. Instead, nonlinear averaging and physiological tracking effects likely drove patterns in plant fitness and resistance to herbivores. We suggest that high defense variation in plants may be a widespread defensive phenotype, but for well-defended plants, variation may inadvertently promote herbivore niche expansion.

Indexed as

HerbivoryPlantsAnimalsModels, BiologicalPlant LeavesArabidopsis thalianaglucosinolateherbivoryintraindividual variationintraspecific trait variationmean–variance interactionnonlinear averagingplant defenseTrichoplusia nivariance decomposition

Identifiers

PMID39902654
PMCPMC11792111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.