Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39902639›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2025

Antibiotic Economies: The Economisation of Antibiotic Use in Australia and Implications for the Mitigation of Antimicrobial Resistance.

M Davis, A Schermuly, A Rajkhowa, K Thursky, N Warren, P Flowers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M DavisSchool of Social Sciences and Centre to Impact AMR, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4075-0466
A SchermulySchool of Social Sciences and Centre to Impact AMR, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
A RajkhowaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
K ThurskyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
N WarrenSchool of Social Sciences and Centre to Impact AMR, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
P FlowersDepartment of Psychology, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

Australian Research Council DP200100002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines how economic rationalities shape antibiotic usage with the aim of expanding options for the reduction of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Antibiotic usage is typically attributed to the individual behaviours of patients, pet owners and prescribers, an emphasis that has neglected sociological explanations, particularly the economic rationalities that are transforming healthcare. We used sociological theory of pharmaceutical capitalisation and economisation to explore in-depth interviews on antibiotic usage with scientists, policymakers, prescribers, patients and pet owners in Australia. Antibiotics attracted values in terms of cost to the patient and pet owner, profit for the clinic, how the drugs saved time away from work and childcare, and how they eased the pressures of self-care, parenting and pet ownership. Economic transactions that are only partially under individual patient and prescriber control shape antibiotic use. In these circumstances, antibiotic use is influenced by other social agents-for example, business managers and clinic owners-decentring prescriber authority. Adoption of socio-economic values of antibiotic usage and inclusion of its other economic agents is needed to improve AMR intervention effectiveness.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, MicrobialAustraliaHumansInterviews as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Anti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID39902639
PMCPMC11791877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.